The desperate effort of relativism by BIRN, Syla: We need to ask if it's Jarra's own life.

Political commentator Valon A. Syla, considers that the first stance by BIRN and director Jarra in trying to justify and distance from the contractive figure lulle Djelice was not honored with logical concessions in their justification.
He emphasises in his writing Sunday that this reasoning does not exceed doubts and only adds more to public.
“For the contrary answer to Jairra Life and the Rooster Flower case
I read a very strange answer from Yaera. Usually, legitimately supported reactions come from BIRN. But this time mostly surprised her conscience in the first question of Progress Rames.
There's a logical contradiction that's hard to explain. The author's identity with the nickname "Lule Djeliu" is not unknown to us at” As we go, we say: “But we don't know who's behind Facebook profiles LET Rooster'”
These are attitudes that either contradict logic, or are desperate attempts to relativize profile users. ”
Jarra and BIRN must come up with the complete truth and co-operate with the law authorities, thus contributing both to the credibility of journalism or to this approach being applied and converted into such lynching subversion figures.
In both cases, it should only be acknowledged that the author with the nickname "Lule Djeliu," known for Calxo.com's behind Facebook profiles like lulle Rooster, which Jarra is hiding.
B IRN and Life Jarra were probably even deceived by someone from the party in power, but it would be very helpful towards Kosovo journalism, as if it gave the name of the person known to the prosecutor.
Otherwise, we're going to ask that those names in the editorials are original or are Cella flowers, and they also, who eventually take Jarre with themselves, knowingly or without.”
Kallxo had published reports of Lule Djeliu under that nickname once as they accepted it in their own text. This figure had terrorised with the lynching campaign and staining many Kosovo opposition figures of power and as it was taught that it is a person named Gent Prokshi, according to reports close to the ruling party.
The Vetevendosje movement has not rarely been criticised for such derogatory campaigns and the instigating tactics of opposition media and public with exclusive arrogance and alienation on baseless charges, instrumentalizing even public institutions for what it has been condemned both inside and abroad by state media and at9o organisations.











