Shkelzen Maliqi: Is Kurt the Man of Serbia?

Analyst Shkelzen Maliqi has commented on political developments in the country, stopping in Prime Minister Albin Kurti's role and attitudes in relation to dialogue and the political situation. He stresses that no one can say that Kurti is Serbia's “man,”, as hard evidence is needed for such a claim. According to him, however, there are elements [...]
He stresses that no one can say that Kurti is Serbia's “man,”, as hard evidence is needed for such a claim. However, according to him, there are elements raising doubts, citing the compliance of Kurti's positions over the years with Serbian leaders such as Vojislav Koštunica and Aleksandar Vučić, especially in relation to the rejection of the Ahtisaari Plan and approach to dialogue.
“I can't say Kurt is a man of Serbia, because that's why hard evidence should be taken. But there is something why his attitudes over the years are almost always compatible with those of Serbian leaders, with Vojislav Koštunica against Ahtisaari's plan, with Aleksandar Vuči about the optimism of dialogue and buying of time, which seems to be helping each other...”, He says it.
Maliqi estimates that these attitudes are characterized by inflexibility, compromise opposition, and the tendency to produce continuing political crises, viewing them as power preservation mechanisms. According to him, it creates perception of a kind of silent co-ordination that negatively affects democratic development and the country's progress.
Full text:
I can't say Kurt is a man of Serbia, because that's why hard evidence should be taken. But there is something why his attitudes over the years are almost always compatible with those of Serbian leaders, with Kostunica versus Ahtisaari's plan, with Vuciqi about the opstrusion of dialogue and buying of time, where it seems they are helping each other... The point is that, and this is easy to prove, that they are unflammable and anti-competitive, lawbreakers and constitutions due to autocratic ambitions in their respective systems, and power-holding fuel have continued crisis production, so they seem to have agreements among themselves. Granted, this does not depend on responsibility for popular crisis products and the contribution to maintaining balance that fosters antidemocratic processes and stalemate, or worse, the recession in the country's development.
The key to Kurt's departure from power is the lack of evidence that his government and he himself are part of coruptive relatives, strange connections in promoting and delegateing power and controlling state institutions and security to unauthorized persons like Dejona Mihali... Also required should be urgent investigation into Florim Krasniqi's statement, former VV supporter who had promised 50 million dollar investment, and who has recently publicly acknowledged that he has invested in the purchase of computer equipment for the lab unit of the LVV workers who for years have been poisoning social networks with news, drilling and hate speech against all those who have criticised the VV or who are considered dangerous rivals to the VVV sect! These are crimes for which evidence can be found and which are punishable, and the prosecution should, even without denouncing, be investigated and followed because there is pronociation and public apology of “investor” of the criminal act.











