“Serious judgments for The Hague” - People's attorney presents British expert report to Special Court.

The report has set up major and serious dilemmas about how the processes were conducted at The Hague Special Court.

The cell has shown details from the report, stressing that continuing detention and refusing access to detention are elements that have violated the process.

The report reveals serious concerns about the length of detention, the refusal of early release, and restrictions on communication with the family. The fact that so far there have been very few early releases, even though years have passed before the process began, suggests that such a claim is not just a concern, but a concrete fact”, Celaj said.

Another problem has been monitoring communications at the detention center.

The systematic monitoring of communications that I have faced, I'm monitored by detention personnel, I'm caught by two cameras, the report finds that systematic monitoring, this framework has serious doubts about violating the European Convention on Human Rights. The concerns we've raised in progress, not only have they been confirmed, but they go beyond those concerns”, Celay said further.

British renowned experts have found the report has raised serious concerns about a fair and independent judgment.

“Linked to jurisdiction, transparency, the report raises serious concerns the absence of an institution of oversight, and institutional control. As far as the standard of the competent independent Court is concerned with fair judgment, the report provides serious concerns in the appointment of juries. The report finds that the chairman has discretion to appoint panels, institution-institution consultations with rule 12. The request for the court's president's expulsion treats the mayor himself, which indicates there are serious problems”, Celaj said further.

The report also listed the statements of the specialised prosecutor Jack Smith, who had said KLA leaders would be sentenced to life in prison, yet without beginning trial.

“The report states that prosecutor Jack Smith's statements include, stressing that KLA leaders will be sentenced to life in prison, conspiring that if these persons are released are dangerous and should be held in custody by the Court's president, pose serious problems for preventing innocence, integrity of the process, and transparency”, Qeyaj said.

This report has also stressed the acceptance of evidence from Serbia.

“In terms of accepting evidence accepted by Serbia, the report states clear judicial uncertainty. Their final assessment is a potential source of uncertainty. For such evidence, the report stresses lack of transparency. They were given without public decision. The principle of arms equality, the report states restrictions on visits, lack of adequate space for preparation, parallel criminal procedures, and changes in the judicial assistance system. These elements are serious indicators that require further analysis of”, Qelaj said, reports Nacionale.

“Autors require the creation of an independent mechanism to monitor the Special Court, a request presented by us long ago”, said Celaj.