Actuals against three persons for counterfeiting poll results in Shtime

According to the prosecution's indictment, the defendants allegedly on December 30th of last year, at the Community Research Centre in Progress, during the process of counting votes for deployments and on the quality of members of the counting team, acting in co-ordination and direct intent, in full opposition to the rules and procedures specified with the KEC's election legislation and legal acts, have taken co-ordinated and inter-connected action with the aim of distorting the results of the vote.

In fact, in the attic emphasis that “in the manner that the defendant Y.S, in the quality of the vote's policyperson, has read and communicate incorrectly and uncontrolledly from balloting, defendant B.V., using exclusive access to the Central Election Commission electronics system, has recorded inaccurate data in the system, without allowing verification and control mechanisms from other members, while indictees of the United States and R. The R., although present and active participants in the process of sharing and verifying ballotation, have consciously failed to take action to prevent or correct obvious irregularities, recognizing and enabling the development of an irregular and uncontrolled process of recounting, via this organised action mechanism and lack of mutual control, unequivocal results of voting for candidates, which have been outlined as essential inconsistencies during the recount process at the Counting Centre and Resolution (QNR), directly violating integrity, integrity and electora2>

The prosecutor of the case, in the case of the establishment of the indictment, has proposed to the Court that after maintaining judicial review, administering their evidence and assessment, the defendants be found guilty of the criminal work they are accused of and convicted of by law.