Krasniqi's defence: Why did he keep the materials if they were part of a criminal enterprise?

Jakup Krasniqi's lawyer, Venkateswari Alagedra, said that the fact that Jakup Krasniqi had not destroyed the sequestra materials from his house that <x0 can incriminate” should be seen as a positive thing. “If Krasniqi had thought that research materials and other documents in his house would be part of a [...]
“If Krasniqi had thought that research materials and other documents in his house would be part of a joint criminal enterprise, where he belonged, or who were incriminating for him, why would he hold them?” said Alagedra.
The fact that held and did not destroy them should be seen in his favor because he is convinced he is innocent”, she said.
Alagedra followed by saying Krasniqi's words were distorted by the prosecution, saying Krasniqi has admitted that these documents were his.
He never said that the materials found in his house were written by him”, Alagedra said.
He actually admitted that he made some notes to write a book, but that doesn't necessarily mean the materials were for conflict”.
The “belongs to the Prosecutor to prove that these documents relate to charges involving Krasniqi's authorship and to confirm the authenticity and credibility of documents, something they have not done so far”. /Periscope












