The LDK's PDK] subject to Dehar's actions is being considered by the Constitution
![The LDK's PDK] subject to Dehar's actions is being considered by the Constitution](/cnt/019de2f3-3d1d-7055-b7b4-8cfc5273a191__m.webp)
Kosovo's Constitutional Court has gathered some materials, expected to be understood by the epilogue of the Kosovo Parliament's Constituent Assembly session, which is viewed as the end even after about five months of elections. PDK and LDK took their classes to this court earlier this month, while yesterday [...]
The Constitutional Court has confirmed that it is reviewing the demands of the Democratic Party of Kosovo and the Democratic League of Kosovo, which have largely submitted courses to assess constitutionality in terms of the Commission's vote on secret voting and constitutionality in sessions held in the Kosovo Assembly following the release of the Constitutional Court's conviction in June.
The new requests regarding the Kosovo Parliament's constitutional session are being considered”, the Constitutional Court said in response to Express, broadcast. Periscope
Meanwhile, in question of what is expected to happen after the 30-day term the Constitution gave MPs for the constitutionalisation of the Parliament, which is expected to expire after three days, the Constitution referred to the latest act of judgment as being viewed.
“The court has finally found that elected deputies of the Republic of Kosovo's Parliament, in the application of Article 1 paragraph 66, in liaison to paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Article 67, as well as articles 70 and 74 of the Constitution, in accordance with the Head of IV of the Parliamenting Order and the untily parliamentary practices for the constitutional framework of the constitution, as well as in accordance with the findings provided in this Act, are binding, rather than later 30 days of access to this constitution, the constitutional obligation to the constitution of Kosovo's Constitution through the election of the Republic of Kosovo and the constitution, under the judgment. The Constitution of the Constitution of the Republic is said.
On 3 July, the Democratic Party of Kosovo had submitted to the Constitutional Court the official requirement for assessing the constitutionality of the actions undertaken during the constitutional session of the Assembly held on 29 June and its continuation on July 1st and 3rd 2025.
This requirement, submitted on behalf of the PDK Parliamentary Group, rejected the session's chairman's request, Avni Dehari, for proposals for members of the Commission for secret voting, to cast the Commission's vote, the Commission's own vote, and the arbitrary interruption of the session after the Commission's disapproval.
All these actions have been taken in open opposition to the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo and with the final act of the Constitutional Court, which has created a new judicial situation and clearly defined the constitutional course that must be followed for the constitutional framework of the Parliament”, he had said. PDK.
A day later, on July 4th, LDK deputies Hykmete Bajrami and Armendi Zemaj, as well as LDK chairmanship member Exchange Manaj, had handed over subjects to the Constitutional Court with a request to assess the constitutionality of the Commission's vote for the secret vote, changing the day from the chairman of the session, Avni Dehar, whom they consider to be at odds with the agenda.
Apart from political parties yesterday, the country's president, Vjosa Osmani, also took action.
It addressed the Constitution with the question of what would happen if the deadline given by the Constitution itself is not respected by MPs and constitutional sessions will continue to be held with the same scenario as in the past 50 times.
Our request today, in essence, is to clarify the judicial consequences of non-compliance of the Parliament within the constitutional deadline of 30 days”, Osman said yesterday at a media conference.
In addition, Osmani has called for a temporary measure to suspend the 30-day deadline with the rationale to avoid anti-unconstitutional actions and for institutions to be formed after the deadline.












