Anim style and some lessons on artificial intelligence boundaries

Another Step Ahead in Skills ChatGPT-is inevitably accompanied by a wave of people who use these capacities to produce imitations of the works of great artists. The latest artist to have been at the centre of media comment and promotion OpenAI-so much as Sam Altman changed his avatar to the platform. X coordinate It's Hayao Miyazaki, cofounder of Studio Ghibli. Social networks are filled with images claiming to be in the same style as Miyazak's works, writes Financial TimesFollow Periscope.

I deliberately used the word “as”, because most of what is produced “seems to be” as work of Studio Ghibli-t, same way as “I look” Will Smith. Color and form (in an average alignment) may be in order. But a careful and devoted look is sufficient, and it becomes clear that the two things are nothing like them. The characters don't make eye contact. The patterns of light and shade, or detailed descriptions are virtually lacking.

Genative images can turn something difficult to understand into something tangible and visible. But they also show us the dangers for which we should be vigilant, especially in ourselves.

A last video on YouTube since “created” The Masterpiece of the Rings [Lord of the Rings] by director Peter Jackson, Miyazak's supposed style, was a typical example. Just stop for a second. The boy and the heron[The Boy and the HeronAnd you'll see facial expressions drawn with care for each of the ogurzin parrots. See orc images in the trainer generated by artificial intelligence [ IA and everybody are identical.

I'm not saying artificial genetic intelligence can't be used for art. If someone takes the time and care to refine every image, using the genetic commands with the same fines with which he uses a pen or a mouse, then this could become an art form, even though it sounds like a process that drains spiritual. But to produce something that has so little to do with Miyazak's art as I do with Will Smith, it's not art and it's depressing and disturbing that so many people think it is.

It is depressing because a person who sees a weak copy and fails to appreciate the beauty of the original is not fully experiencing life. If you think you like it Studio GhibliBut he allows the quality of art to escape attention, denying himself the full satisfaction that the work of this study offers. And, it's disturbing, because the most exciting uses of AI in the workplace and public policies have to do with transforming tasks that require hours in tasks that are carried out more quickly but, nevertheless, require significant human judgment.

These advances have the potential to significantly increase productivity and well-being. They are especially important to the state. In education, for example, replacing the process of assessment and administrative work is a major consumption of the most important and valuable resource in a classroom -- the time and energy of teachers -- is an area the British government is considering. Meanwhile, in health, a pilot company project Palatir has already released several hours of medical staff by transforming the force that previously claimed hours of doctors in tasks completed in much shorter times.

To protect ourselves from mistakes, however, we need to remember that IA is not a magic force that offers us safe answers, but an extremely effective tool to use with caution. There is good evidence now that many of us do not do this and that frequent use of cetbots actually makes people more lonely and dependent on them. Research also shows that the most vulnerable initial programmers do not improve in programming, but become more self-discreet with their inability due to the use of the existing gene.

Not new is the problem of over-reliance on cars, whether it's a computer thing, such as the wrong software that unjustly condemned British Post officials for fraud, or an algorithm as a guide for criminal penalties. It is not our tendency to turn devices that make life easier on objects that we burden with unjustified authority. What is new is that it supports the IA's transforming potential, to improve our lives, there is also the risk of catastrophic impact if used in a blind and inconsiderate way.

What brings about the rise of the IA is ironicly a reminder of an old truth: that the most important and more resistant curve of time is what gives us knowledge and meaning, not just ability and that giving sense, is to encourage people to look at things deeper, whether it's a detail on an animated sidewalk or a proposal that wrote a smart “ <x01> car.