PZAP annuls a CEC decision: Orders to count, and toʹi includes 1,631 ballot

The Electoral Panel for Ances and Parashta has accepted the Vetevendosje Movement's complaint of recounting 1,631 votes declared invalid in the framework of votes abroad. P The ZAP has cancelled the CEC's preliminary decision on this and has ordered that “make the opening of 177 ballot boxes, with 1631 [...]
The PZAP has cancelled the CEC's preliminary decision on this and has ordered it that “make the opening of 177 ballot boxes, with 1631 invalid ballots sent by voters outside Kosovo to CEC post boxes” and demanded that the “s the same ballotings be re-evaluated, counted and included in the final<3> result.
“Paneli estimated that in terms of the vote's validity issue containing the technical error with printing-princing has already been decided by PZAP with the number A.n.223/2025 date 04.03.2025, where the ballots in which the purpose of voters has clearly been expressed, and the printing of the incomplete cannot violate the right of voters to express their will”, it is said. Decision.
The CEC Secretariat had recommended that the CEC make the recount and opening of all ballot boxes for ballots sent by voters outside Kosovo to the CEC mailbox.
“Under such circumstances where PZAP already has a decision on balloting that has been declared invalid on the part of the CEC, in respect of the right of the vote of each citizen is estimated that in this case the Central Election Commission (KQZ), respectively, the Counting and Resolution Centre (QNR), according to the recommendation of the CEC Secretary of the date 06.03.2025, to make the opening of 177 ballot boxes, with 1631 invalid ballots sent from Kosovo to the CZZS, the same pages of re-netoy, and included in the final score of the POZ3rd25H. The decision is reported in the 0432025.
In recount, PZAP orders that “The CEC, respectively, finds the votes considered invalid in the following case only: More than one political subject is voted out, no political subject is voted, candidate, not political subject is voted, and the goal of voters is not clear according to voting procedures and counting at”.
Of all these reasons, based on the provisions of Article 117. 4, about Article 118 par.1 of LZP, about Article 13 pars. Ten below. The 10.1 of the PZAP Order (N.012024), was set as a device for this decision.












