Artane Rizvanolli lied at the Prosecutor's Office, said he knew that the Swiss anti-legal company won tender, denied by messages in Whats App

The favourite of Little S company. A. for urgent calylla repair in the A4 block, under negotiated procedure, despite the fact that the same was declared irresponsible (in the open precautions) was the axis of the excise on former KEK chief Nagip Krasniqi, who, according to the indictment, would cause damage to Kosovo's worth budget of over 36m euros.

“So, as a result of the defendants' actions for July 19th 2022 to May 6, 2023, the A5 bloc was out of order, so KEK was forced to import electricity in the amount of 890,056 earlier, causing KEK and Kosovo's budget to damage on a large scale, in the amount of 36 million and 349 thousand and 638 euros and 62 cents”, The indictment against Nagip Krasniqi is reported.

This 36 million damage to Kosovo's budget, there is a history of communications in the WhatsApp, and along with the indictment against Krasniqi, two other presentations of the two names as witnesses to the prosecution would be made known: Daytona Mihali and Artane Rizvanolli. (And an invitation to Prime Minister Albin Kurti, who today and several months continue to fail to respond).

For the first one, Nacional yesterday brought exclusive participation from prosecution interrogation, while for the second, Mrs. Rizvanolli, we bring some parts exclusively today.

In part of the statement, Minister Rizvanelli is asked about Mr. Nagip Krasniqi and the flow of conversation according to the record follows the following:

Prosecutor: Have you fallen to see Mr. Krasniqi?

Witness: Much more often than other companies because I cover the energy sector, but especially the fact that there has been an unprecedented energy crisis.

Prosecutor: When you say I cover the energy sector in what sense?

The Witness: The Economy Ministry made policies, strategies, legislation and proposes to the energy sector but conditions of specific circumstances such as crises can also interfere in the market to ensure support and affordable prices.

Procurage: When you say I can step in on the market, explain this part?

Witness: Under legislation in effect, it can in certain cases. I have an obligation to energy companies.

Prosecutor: During how long has Nagip Krasniqi chief chief had to use this legislative mechanism?

Witness: Yes, from December 2021 to sometime in the spring of 2023, in some cases perhaps ten (10) have been in force for the energy supply that I remember, for thirty - day periods or sixty days.

Prosecutor: Give us a concrete example of these thirty-day or sixty-day decisions?

Witness: Stopping the use of electricity for accepting waves.

Prosecutor: In the above-mentioned emergency cases there was government subvention for KEK, is that correct?

Witness: But there was a maintenance-based subvention, re-detonation of KEK blocks.

Prosecutor: Were you informed when the remont procedures started at KEK?

Witness: To a large extent, I had said yes, but not always. Especially during this period of crisis.

In part of the testimony, Rizvanol would be asked how the fact was explained that at the time of the 2021-2023 energy crisis, the A5 block would go to remont.

Prosecutor: How do you explain the fact that, as you said, there was an energy crisis in December 2021 spring 2023, but on the other side of that period of time, the A5 block went to Remont?

Witness: These specifics, I believe, can respond to KEK, the remonts are regular, as you know, once a year, and sometimes once every three years, you don't know the specifics for each.

Prosecutor: At that time, Mr. Krasniqi has informed you that the A5 bloc is going to Remont?

Witness: I guess yes, we've had regular contacts every time a block was out of order.

Fuck.

Litwin lying

In part of the testimony, Minister Artane Rizvanolli was asked about the Swiss company Liewtin é reportedly that it was discussed in whatsApps that were located in Nagip Krasniqi, Albin Kurti, Besnik Bislimi, Dejona Mihali, Artane Rizvanolli, Hekuran Murati and Milot Kelmendi.

The following evidence is:

Prosecutor: Do you remember that Mr. Krasniqi has asked for your help with the Swiss Litain Company?

Witness: No.

Prosecutor: Do you remember if these communications with Little Company were mentioned by Ambassador Switzerland?

The Witness: No, I don't remember:

The prosecutor offers the information on the details of the report on hand-written forensics, pages 63.

Prosecutor: Has this meeting been realized?

Witness: Not as far as I know.

Prosecutor: Why did he need to meet the ambassador for a private company like Little?

Witness: I guess it was because I can't remember whether they know about this company and the reasons for the contract failure because sometimes foreign companies have concerns, problems, complain or share information with their respective embassies.

Prosecutor: How come you don't remember the reason for the meeting, on the other hand when I asked you if this meeting was adjourned you without having to say no.

Witness: I don't remember the others who had this meeting but I haven't attended as far as I can remember.

Remont Realisation Failure

In part of Artane Rizvanol's testimony, the minister would be asked if he knew why the realisation of the remont had failed, referring to her communication on the same issue with Mr. Nagip Krasniqi.

Prosecutor: You said you had regular meetings with Mr. President. Krasniqi, do you remember what happened to the A5 block boiler because in the communication of the 2202.23s, you write that the Kalda contract has practically failed!

Witness: I don't remember, but I know there's been a few failures of remntot realisation.

Prosecutor: Do you know why these failures occurred?

Witness: I don't remember specifics, but if I didn't go wrong there was a procedure but there was no bidder, it was long after the pandemic there was a problem with supply chain, then there was one or more more processes that I don't remember but that there was a failure and the redham was done by what I know in 2023 if I didn't.

Prosecutor: Did he ask for your help in implementing the commando project?

Witness: I don't remember but he informed us and we were interested because it was important at the time, especially because it was the energy crisis, we had the high prices of import.

Prosecutor: At that time, what did you cover the energy products of the A5 block?

Witness: The energy we don't produce and obtain from import.

Fuck.

Rizvanolli was a group manager in Whatsapp

Communications over the phone, and especially through the Huhatsapp platform, were frequent in the group, where Rizvanol does not deny in her statement to the prosecutor, that he created it on his own.

Prosecutor: Is it true that you founded this group administration group?

Witness: I don't remember, it could be.

Why was the private person in the group Dejona Mihali?

In part of the testimony, Rizvanolli would also be asked about the presence of Prime Minister Albin Kurti in this group of Whatsapp, as well as why “a private person named Dejona Mihali” should be in that group.

Prosecutor: And in this communication group, the Prime Minister has been involved, sir. The prime minister and other state officials, is that correct?

Witness: I don't remember who was exactly in the group, but yes.

Prosecutor: Is it correct that this group has also been citizen Dejona Mihali?

Witness: Could have been in the group for a while.

Prosecutor: Is Daytona Mihali official of state institutions?

Witness: No.

Prosecutor: Is it official to the Ministry where you exercise your duty?

Witness: No.

Prosecutor: As far as you know, is KEK official?

Witness: No.

Prosecutor: In terms of situations whether emergency or regular at KEK, have you consulted Dejona Mihalin?

Witness: As I recall, within the group in the Whatsapp.

Prosecutor: Why have you communicated official issues with a private person?

Witness: The Dejona is the co-ordinator of professional committees in the Vetevendosje Movement, which includes the Energy Committee, and has knowledge of Vetevendosje Movement policies for the energy sector.

Prosecutor: I believe that in the ministry where you lead you have officials of the field of expertise, why do you need to consult a person who is not part of institutions?

Witness: We're talking to a non-formal group that has been discussed on various energy issues.