The Sekiraqa-Capas conflict: Sentence required for allegedly hiding two weapons from location

The Pristina Constitutional Prosecutor has called on Pristina's Constitutional Court to make a decision on detention for suspect Vesel Bulnjakou, as under the prosecution's letter, there is reasonable suspicion, given camera registration, Vesel Bunjak in co-ordination has carried out criminal work “Manipulation with prove” by Article 389 paragraph 1 of the Code [...]
According to the prosecution's letter, it is alleged that after the end of the conflict between the Sequiraks and the Capes on the evening of September 1st, where one was killed and several injured, Bunjak had taken two pistols allegedly one of Salih Sekirakiq and the other of Fatos Abbas, and he has concealed the same in a local.
“There is reasonable doubt that by the date 01.09.2024, according to camera clock 21:42:16, which differs from the real time, after the end of the shooting between the two groups, with the aim of hiding and manipulation by trial, defendant Vesel Bunjak gets two weapons which allegedly one of the defendants Salih Sequiraques black guns, and the other is suspected to be the defendant Fatos Abazi in white color, with what goes to the local cards, where the local cameras are seen in the back of the local hand, and then the back of the local guns are returned to the local times where the prosecutor's camera is told by the prosecutor, there are no longer reported in Express.
The prosecution has also supported the fact that the suspect Vesel Bulnjak has been in pain of sentence for “helped conduct the murder” and “arme without permission” and was released on parole on July 29th 2024, where he had remained two years and two months in prison to suffer. Also, the prosecution's letter says that the same one after the incident has completely cooperated with the police, not showing where the guns are and why they have been removed from the scene.
For these reasons it can be escaped and may be concealed to avoid being deprived of freedom, with what would make it difficult to develop the criminal procedure and affect procrastination of the investigation in view of its constitutional release”, the prosecution's letter said.













