The policeman's death in the accident, the witness says the trailer was unregistered and without technical control

Kelmendi's statements were given in the court examination of the Constitutional Court in Pec, reports the “Justice Trust”.

Kelmendi has said that on the critical day of accused Arton Duraku, he had asked for his trailer to pick up a Bager on Sunday.

He said that they had then taken and mounted the trailer in the truck and that it was unregistered, without technical control, knowing and taking responsibility over the accused Arton Duraku.

Witness Kelmendi said that she was still working and had never had a problem with her.

He gave it back to me at 11-12, called me back. Now he said a little bit back or come back himself, then Neziri told me he'd quietly bring it back and then he'd brought me the speed trailer Kelmendi and Arton Duraku”, said witness Kelmendi.

Initially, state prosecutor Ersan Qavolli said in his opening remarks that during this trial the accused had caused the accident that caused the death of the deceased.

According to the prosecutor, the accused had not offered any assistance, and in the first examination he had pleaded guilty. According to him, they now refuse guilt and feel no remorse for the work and the consequence.

During this review, prosecutor Qavolli said they will hear the injured, witnesses as well as experts, where with full conviction, he says the court will finally issue a conviction act by convicting and condemning the two accused under law.

The State Prosecutor's Word was supported by the representative of the damaged party, Salih Mekaj, adding that the facts they will face during this judicial examination, which he says have strong support with evidence attached to the indictment, said the facts are notary.

According to lawyer Mekaj, the criminal offense was committed in the form of eventual will, and in this respect said it confirms the fact that defendant Arton Duraku, had been driving the vehicle without a driver's license for a long time and from the list of criminal evidence, it was not the first case of traffic law violations.

In his opening address, Enver Shabaj says he doesn't know exactly where his son had died, near his home in Naberdjan village, or Yashanica in Cline. According to him, in the video recording there was seen to be an assassination where the numerous movements of the accused for 3 minutes gave rise to doubt that after the accident of the injured Shabaj, the decision was made to kill his son for reasons not to tell the truth.

He asked the court and prosecution to recall the work to serious murder, since there are enough elements that describe it as a cruel murder and escape from the site of the event sly.

On the other hand, defendant Arton Duraku's defender, lawyer Shefesh Ibrahimi, said his protector along with his father does not deny the accident, they have pain in losing the life of the deceased but they do not accept the qualifications of the criminal act that the same one has deliberately acted.

He said his defense has apologised, the accident admits it happened, but not according to the qualifications and qualifications of the criminal act according to the indictment, and in the end said no action of his defense would be proven for failing to respond to the victim's aid.

Later, the defender of the accused, Nezir, lawyer Belkize Berisha, said that as far as the prosecution's indictment is concerned, the defence considers the same is unstable in the fact that with no evidence found on the subject's paperwork has been proven that its defender has committed the criminal act, which is being placed on burden.

She said that with evidence from the prosecution, there is no clear indication that the deceased's death has occurred at the scene as a result of the accident or as a consequence of the aid relationship.

According to her, after the trial management, another actual situation will be proven from what has been described in the device of the indictment.

The injured Enver Shabaj, in the witness's quality, said the critical day he saw in the morning that his son had only gone to the police academy in Vushtrri before 6am, and after going to work he forgot his phone at home and had no information from anyone.

He said how he went to work, all the other colleagues had some weirder action than other times, asking him that “what's new to you”, and running away from him not to get the news from them.

Mr.com went to the second floor to ask my colleague to borrow my phone that calls my brother to bring my phone to my office and coma, and he saw that all my colleagues were tearfully wondering why you are this and let me reason that there's a flu”, said Shabay.

He then said one of his colleagues had told him that they had taken a very painful call and that nowhere to go worse, he was still thinking about his boss if something had happened to his family.

From the reactions of other colleagues, he automatically realized that something had happened in his family, and he had taken the car to go home with a colleague.

Before I went home, I told Jevdet if he's dead, he'll just touch my hand if someone else's dead with names, Jevdet has put his hand on the car at Naberdjan's entrance and he's touched my hand, the dish I asked me to give me for the F. This is where I realized he died”, said the injured Shabaj.

He said he was initially aware that he was self-sensive, according to the police spokesman, but after hours he realized from social networks who was the truck that caused the accident and the next day he realized who they were.

According to the witness, the accused Nezir had asked him to go to the funeral, telling him he felt sorry for the case and that his son had only been in the truck and that the truck had been defective.

The injured Shabai said that he thought he could do this work on the day of his burial and forgive his blood on the spot, but then he realized that even the accused Nezir had been there, and that the event was different.

In the first trial, the two defendants had been sentenced to 15 years in prison (both) by the Pec Foundation Court.

The first - degree ruling had confirmed that the Court of Appeals had confirmed, but the Supreme Court had approved the demands for the protection of Duraku's legality, so that the Act of Foundation, and that of Appeals had been cancelled, and the case had turned into a first degree retrial.

Otherwise, at the April 3, 2023 session, the two accused Arton and Nezir Duraku pleaded guilty to the criminal acts they were charged with.

In contrast, according to the indictment filed on March 2, 2023, by Pec's Founding Prosecutor, it is said that defendant Arton Duraku, on November 21, 2022, in the village of Jasanica of Cline City, breaking the law on public trafficking causes the deceased F. St.

According to the indictment, until the defendant, without a driver's license, was leading the branding truck “Mercedes Atego”, which was unregistered and not technically regular, as soon as he reached the upper village of Skenderaj Kline, does not adjust the speed of moving to the conditions of the road and exceeds it by 50km/h how much it was allowed to over 90km/h and moves to the left in the anti-circusion tape, where he was rolling with his branding vehicle <x> the F.S.ch.ch.ch.ch.ch. where the first to hit the frontal car”, where the first victim was suffered from the frontalcth car.

According to the indictment, the defendant, Arton Duraku, reportedly committed a criminal offence “The threat of public trafficking” by Article 370 pars. 5 connected to par. One to KPRK.

In the meantime, further in the indictment, it is said that, at the site and high-term, defendant Arton, as truck driver “Mercedes Atego”, does not offer help to the other person who was injured in the traffic accident caused by the defendant's truck, resulting in the death of victim F. Sh, where, after the accident described, he stops the truck and along with his parent, defendant Nezir Duraku, exits the truck near the victim but offers no help and leaves the scene while the victim changes lives.

And with that it is said that the defendant has Arton Duraku has committed a criminal offense “the failure to help the person injured in the public traffic disaster” by Article 374 pars. 3 KPRK.

While defendant Nezir Duraku charged the indictment that in the event described above, it does not offer help to the other person whose life has taken place at direct risk even though he could do so without any serious danger to himself or the other.

In addition, it is said that after defendant Arton Duraku causes a truck traffic accident where defendant Nezir was a passenger in it, exit the truck, approach the victim, but offer no help and leave the scene while the victim changes lives.

In this case, defendant Nezir Duraku is said to have committed a criminal offence “a failure to assist” by Article 188 par.4 KPRK's.