Donika Gervala tries to shut down “bassor” that stood up each time for Kosovars arrested by Serbia

The secretary of the Kosovo Liaison Office in Serbia, Fatmir Hajoli, has been constantly loud when Kosovo citizens have been arrested by Serbian authorities, writes Periscopi.

And for his commitment, Chajoll has received an observation from the Foreign Affairs Minister, who is headed by Donika Gervala.

Hajoll has expressed criticism through a post in his Facebook account MPJD for failing to assess his work by the ministry.

For the end, as long as in Serbia there is a race for who is most and more strongly promoted against the Republic of Kosovo, without any argument and without any justice, I would, with understanding, seek the grace of the MPJD, the taskgivers and the pronunciations of where, when and in which respect, my statements have gone against the Office's mandate and with the priorities of MPJD”, he wrote among other things.His full post:

Friends,
For my continued reactions and statements in defence of public interest, citizens and, above all, in defence of state interest, I just received a written note from the MPJD. Once apart from endless recommendations, references, assessments, in the MPJD and abroad, this is the first note in my professional, institutional experience. I hope this is the last one.
I have to say that I have not expected that being vocal against the actions of Serbia, I will be praised or advanced in any way, and that it was not my intention to do so, but I have to say it and re-servation, that even if the corrective measure against me was the self-respection and removal of MPJD, in any case, I did not harbor any dilemma, that in all my pre-medical communications, I would do the same again.
For the end, as long as in Serbia there is a competition over who is most and more strongly promoted against the Republic of Kosovo, without any argument and without any right, I would logically seek the grace of the MPJD, the taskgivers and the Albanian,
Where, when and in what respect, my statements have gone against the mandate of the Office and the priorities of the MPJD.
In the absence of any specific supporting reasoning, I point to me with accompanying documents/witness as are my posts related to it, I'm going to hold it as Reference and Recommand, so I won't complain directly.
Thank you for at least through observation knowing my work, for in a culture of punishment and exclusion, I would be surprised by just an gratitude or appreciation!
Explain:
To warn of an official information that doesn't touch the dimension of the foreign policy, but only my person, I think it's worth the idea that silence in diplomacy is of value!