2 days agocopyright and content created by artificial intelligence
Periskopi(2 years ago)
(2 years ago)Artists and creators say their works have been used to build the artificial intelligence industry, which benefits billions of dollars but without giving them any compensation. America's Voice correspondent Matt Able announces a bill that would force artificial intelligence companies to show they are using [...]
Artists and creators say their works have been used to build the artificial intelligence industry, which benefits billions of dollars but without giving them any compensation. U.S. Voice correspondent Matt Dibble announces a bill that would force artificial intelligence companies to show that they are using a material for which copyright exists.
Artist Carla Ortiz draws characters and scenes for the film and television industry.
These are some of the creations I made for the Black Panther”, She says.
Wanted by customers for its unique skills and style, Mrs. Ortiz was shocked to discover that artificial intelligence systems were designed to produce images using its art and are now simulating it.
The “is unimaginable. Especially because it's about a billion-dollar industry that now competes with us”, Artistita Ortiz expresses it.
Many artificial intelligence generation systems have been created using massive amounts of text and images collected from the internet without the permission or knowledge of the person or company with copyright.
Mrs. Ortiz is among the creators and individuals who enjoy copyright that are challenging such a practice through a series of lawsuits against artificial intelligence companies.
Artificial intelligence companies claim that collecting data from the Internet, which is publicly available, is a legitimate act, according to the principles of the proper use of American law on copyright.
As the process continues, Congress is considering the possibility of asking artificial intelligence companies to discover the source of each part of the content they have used. The bill is seen as the first step towards compensation for individuals who have the right to content.
“vable to the proposals presented in the European Union, the bill that I have brought supports transparency on the part of companies, specifying that they announce on various materials for which the copyright exists and which are used in artificial intelligence systems, ensuring that the creators are informed and have available the means needed to seek respect for copyright and compensation, according to case”.
The project is well known, as even creative industry groups and unions are calling for the licensing of artificial intelligence systems designed to create content.
Stanford University law professor Mark Lemley is representing two artificial intelligence companies on two issues currently under consideration. He says compensation is a fair target, but accounts do not appear.
Take as an example the company I represent, Stability Al. They operate 2 billion images on LAION database, the whole company is worth $2 billion. Even if we took half the company's money and gave it to artists or other creators, they would take only 50 cents. ”
The bill that protects copyright is important for reasons beyond compensation, says technology expert James Grimman.
I think it's useful that artificial intelligence development is more careful about keeping data, knowing which data groups are being used, where they came from, who's controlling them for accuracy and quality. A rule that determines the source can help establish the highest quality standards in the entire” industry, He says it.
Just as a host of legal and ethical challenges followed the development of artificial intelligence, even when and how those who laid its foundation will be compensated for is an ongoing challenge. / VOA
