Dimal Basha continues attacks on journalists: They're setting up a deal that's only interested in Vuchiqi

Vetevendosje Movement MP Dimal Basha has reacted to AGK and RTK directors regarding their positions against Basha, following an interview yesterday on public television. Basha said their reactions are ignorance and violation of freedom of expression.

He said he correctly responded to RTK's journalist and that he didn't approve it,

First “, I've never intimated a journalist. I answered the first time on the topic of association with a lot of correctness, and when he asked me about association again, I said I shouldn't have to be a priority and a key topic in the association dialogue! I understand if he insisted on RTS, but for our journalists. NOT supposed to be V What an association, because there are 38 other agreements! This is not only my opinion, but also my deep conviction that the unconscious journalists are falling into Serbia's trap and putting into the center a single deal that only interests Vuciqi! How is an instigative of me challenging journalists that association should not be the main concern in the debate? Paradoxal, are you trying to punish my right of thinking by calling for freedom of speech? This indicates that you have no haber in this field! ”, he said.

Full Posting:

REAGIM!

He's worried. AGK and Directors i RTK, scykins I have intimidu journalist and I'm under attack AGKA!

Some arguments why none stands and their reactions are ignorance and the very violation of freedom of speech!

Intimination!

First of all, I never have an optimist. I answered the first time on the topic of association with a lot of correctness, and when he asked me about association again, I said I shouldn't have to be a priority and a key topic in the association dialogue! I understand if he insisted on RTS, but for our journalists. NOT supposed to be V What an association, because there are 38 other agreements! This is not only my opinion, but also my deep conviction that the unconscious journalists are falling into Serbia's trap and putting into the center a single deal that only interests Vuciqi! How is an instigative of me challenging journalists that association should not be the main concern in the debate? Paradoxal, are you trying to punish my right of thinking by calling for freedom of speech? This indicates that you have no haber in this field!

I don't know if you noticed that even when Lajcak and Escobar come here, most of the journalists, the only question is that “will be implemented with association, ” “will have measures unless there is association... “No questions for 38 other agreements? Nor for the transgressions of Serbia! Not for the dead! Not for discrimination by Albanians in the Valley! So you find this phenomenon much more pronounced in full journalists, but I think that the public medium paid on citizen taxes has to have a different approach! How is this criticism of my investigation?

In short, I've been critical that association is not a major part of the dialogue debate, and that after I answered once, and after that we've continued the interview with other questions with many correctives, and we are greeted without any hard feelings. This is the debate, and this is democracy! Who else says you don't know in this field?

Threat!

Next, AGK said I attacked him! Why aren't you publicizing who's attacking you? Do you know why? Because there is no attack!

I have the AGK critic, and I offer three arguments! The first one, which has defended Klan Kosovo by accusing us of violating freedom of the press, when it is still behind press freedom, but with company fraud against the state. Second, that does not respond to the daily slander of some portals and journalists who are sulking the work of honest journalists! And the third, who don't deal with the part where international reports speak black and black for the media in Kosovo, where they are accused of taking money for positive reporting, and also corrupt for abandoning investigations! Reports also speak of how political and business elites influence different media. Are reports international attacks on you?

Why the same criticism of mine is an attack, but when America says it you structure and package my criticism as attacks! Paradoxal and dangerous, because when you pack up criticism as an attack, it's a tendency to shut my mouth so I don't criticize you, so you're going to kill your free thought in the name of an organization that should protect him! Weak, weak!

RTK's DIRETOR!

But short for the RTK director's reaction. Well, very well there's a reag, because there's no known subject to protect them, but only freedom of speech, but what I'm sorry about is that neither the director knows about this field nor does it reacts, because he doesn't like my criticism about a subject. Where there is a threat to freedom of the press with criticism. Criticism may not like the director or journalist, but that is the essence of freedom of expression, where it is debated about everyone and everything! I know you're independent, and I always wish you'd remain that way, but independence. YOU are not immune to criticism.

Unfortunately, you sound like the justice system, because they also say that in the name of independence criticism is prevented from anything they do and act. The weak, too weak, because you're showing how little you understand in this area that you have a profession, and that worries me because you lead a public media medium and, for the most part, freedom of speech is the pillar of democracy!

Finally, criticism is freedom of expression, and packing criticism as intimulation and assault is ignorance and tendency to press it. I'm mostly worried that they are calling to kill the debate and that the very free speech journalists and organisations who are called upon to defend it!

Weak, weak!