Basha reacts to AGKA and Reporters Without Borders, a little backed up by encouraging language: I'm attacking, I'm critical

MP Dimal Basha, who claimed the subx0> discipline of AGK and RTK by state”, has been a little backed up by the promotional language after receiving criticism from AGK's Reporters Without Borders. He in response to the AGK says that with the Constitution he enjoys rights like journalists. And Secretary General of the European Federation of Journalists Ricardo Gutierez, [...]
He in response to the AGK says that with the Constitution he enjoys rights like journalists.
While European Federation of Journalists Secretary General Ricardo Gutierez, who told Basha “Boll ma” for his language to journalists, the MP has replied that he is not attacking them but is criticising journalists.
The first “, there is no attack but there are critics, and as they should know, criticism is freedom of expression in Kosovo, not attack”, he writes.
His full post:
REAGIM OF AGK and European Federation of Journalists Secretary Mr. Ricardo Gutierrez!
He's starting with the reaction. i AGK where it still has to stop from the <x0 series of attacks. ”
Well, I asked you to tell the public what my attack was on you, and you didn't give a single argument! I gave him my criticism, which is part of freedom of expression, but you don't have answers and you're making two basic mistakes.
First, you're asking for amnesty, but that's because freedom of expression doesn't house anyone with criticism, including AGK! The other is hypocrisy, because when I criticize you, you qualify it as an attack, and when the U.S. State Department report contains the same criticism, you don't make a sound and you don't ask America to shut up. I don't understand which part of this argument is unclear?
Second, please read the analogy carefully and learn about the risk you're causing when you describe the criticism as an attack!
(a) You're saying that my 3 criticisms of AGK are attacks!
(b) Attacks are prohibited and punished by law - criminal acts!
(c) Consequently, do you want me to be punished and go to prison for the criticism that I have against you?
You're saying you're calling to protect freedom of expression for journalists and the media, while you're trying to punish me with the same right! The constitution does not say that freedom rights are enjoyed only by journalists, but by every citizen of the republic, including me as an MP! So this is extremely dangerous, because you're asking for amnesty for yourself and punishment for me, for the same right that you need to know the Constitution guarantees for everyone!
I believe this is a healthy debate, but the call for one side to be crushed and stifled debate and therefore freedom of expression. These are amateur mistakes that swear to harm freedom of speech, and I'm sorry that in this case I have to protect freedom of speech from you! You can complain both to the EU and to Lajcak and Borelli, but freedom of expression is not exclusive only to you, but to all citizens!
As for Ricardo's reaction Gutierrez, I have three things you need to know!
First, there is no attack, but there are critics, as they should know, criticism is freedom of expression in Kosovo, not attack!
Second, I don't understand what a value system is calling from your position to ask the prime minister of the country to silence an MP! I don't know how much you know about me, but I'm an independent deputy in thought, and that Kosovo is not an autocracy where a person decides who thinks. Furthermore, it is absolutely unacceptable and anti-democratic with a request from the prime minister of a democratic country to condemn the right of criticism to an MP. I don't think you'd have the same courage and write such a letter to a prime minister or Belgian deputy. I am educated in the United States where freedom of expression is sacred and belongs to all citizens, including MPs, and the same standard I'm looking for Kosovo, so your approach and request is absurd and anti-democratic!
Finally, with “Boll in” you can address your children, not a deputy of a democratic country, because I don't feel inferior to you and nobody who violates my right to be freely criticized! I don't expect much more from AGK because I don't believe they know much of it as a field, but I'm sorry that you as secretary general of the European Federation of Journalists have the courage to threaten with silence an MP because you don't like criticism of your colleagues at AGK, which you find even in international reports.
You've also come up with the Kosovo Clan, but now the KPM, but fortunately we know the Kosovo camel journalism better than you see in a bibly from Belgium! So I expect a more democratic approach, and it's absolutely unacceptable the threat of silence to a deputy of a democratic country, which unfortunately is sounding more like manager of UNMIK, not protector and promoter of freedom of expression!












