Security recognition, Catazi: Osman's statements against Ambassador Hill reflect its shallow political knowledge in the area of security

ForKatazi, the key to who is close to NATO membership is to the United States. And they decide who's close to the alliance and who's not.

Thus, Kosovo's foreign policy, whose representative is president, instead of creating bridges of co-operation, strengthening international ties, etc., is creating divisions and conflicts, jeopardising the rich heritage of the state by bringing Kosovo into position for Kosovo to be further away. NATO, rather than Serbia.

Among other things, it has added that unfortunately, these declarations of the president reflect its shallow political knowledge in the area of security. All countries of the world, including the U.S. who are planetary superpowers, in security policies are reserved to take uniform action, whatever they may be without consultation with their allies.

And when the United States of America acts this way, in Kosovo a person comes out and destroys this value, which is the legacy of founding fathers, and blood poured out, from invisibility or perhaps from other interests. Such attitudes, according to Cajtazi, may also be no surprise when we consider its limitations, although it did not believe that it would go so far to confront a country that barely collects a budget of about 3 billion to a world superpower.

For Kaytazi, bringing current power is similar to Serbia's approach in the 1990s. Neither the US nor the European states were interested in bombing Serbia. Gradually, I was initially pressured by sanctions, but every wave of the latter was countered by the argument that he had popular support until the bombings came.

It is therefore incredible that 25 years after the NATO bombings, a president will appear in Kosovo and will oppose the leading actor who has influenced Kosovo to flow to America in order to create conditions to come to Serbia's bombing. /Tv revenge