Hill of “nervose” President, Ramadani: Disturbing ambassador's statement, Osman is making the situation more frustrating.

Yesterday US Ambassador to Serbia Christopher Hill said that “Serbia is closer to NATO membership than Kosovo”. This statement has prompted reactions in Kosovo, until even President Osmani sharply countered Ambassador Hill that “anyone who considers Serbia close to Serbia NATO offends Milosevic's victims”. [...]
Political affairs acquaintance Shkodran Ramadani in a proposal for Periscope said that Ambassador Hill's statement is disturbing and shows the level of reports between Kosovo and the US.
“Christopher Hill's statement is really disturbing because it testifies once again to the level of degradation of reports between Kosovo and the United States, which is Kosovo's greatest ally, especially since the war so far... and shows the constructiveness of the Kosovo government that it has chosen by damaging its relations with the United States”, Ramadani said.
As for President Osmani's reaction to the American Ambassador to Serbia, Ramadani stressed that it does not contribute to improving reports with the US, rather it says they are confrontational.
““Serbia is much larger than Kosovo” this is really a new point of degrading US and Kosovo relations, while President Osmani's statement does not seem to contribute anything to the improvement of this report, and it even seems to me that it is more frustrating and confrontational, so it seems that this government seems that apart from having damaged the report with the US, it does not appear to be reflecting, it does not seem that it is trying to repair the reports, but only as a colder or even more, Ramadani added.
Asked about yesterday's meeting of Deputy Bisliminist Petar Petkoviqi in Brussels on the dinar issue, Ramadani said that Kurti's “positions have fallen into water”.
“This is the next concession, a few weeks ago, chief Prime Minister Kurti has said there is no normalisation of reports without Radojciqi's extradition to Kosovo's justice organs, has said that there is no negotiating a decision that is technical and independent institutions, but now normally with going there both positions have fallen into water, and Kosovo has again been introduced into a spiral of concessions concessions of the successive”, he concluded.
While analyst Agon Maliqi through a post in his Facebook account said the “declaration of Hill is technically accurate”.
Otherwise the Hill statement is technically correct: Serbia has more joint exercises with NATO and is contributing to its top priority, which is Ukraine's weapons. Kosovo could be closer today NATO, unless governed by a government that ignores co-ordination with NATO, threatens at its expense and tries to dictate policy”, Maliqi wrote.
“Hill is ambassador to Serbia, that's what he has to do, to fondle public opinion in Serbia. Meanwhile, he and the embassy there parallelly bring information to the media (see last week's report to the Nova TV opposition media) that Serbia has financed Radojcicicic companies several days behind Banjska information that “seized” with Escobar's statement in Pristina. For those who want to understand, and are not geopolitical delirants who think that US politics should be detected by Kosovo, it's more of a sort of perfect strategy for the cynical embrace of Vuciqi until his political death; of using its weakness to postpone the agreement with Kosovo and to ease anti-Western sentiment in Serbia”.












