Constitutional decision: Over 40m euros will be returned to citizens who paid electricity for the north

More than 40m euros will be turned to consumers who had paid the current for Serbs in the north, based on a decision made by the Energy Regulatory Office (ZRRE). The verdict has already taken its final form, as such was confirmed by the Constitutional Court, which has found no offense [...]
The verdict has already taken its final form, since this is confirmed by the Constitutional Court, which has found no violations in the Constitutional, Appeals, and Supreme decision.
“Consequently, the Court, by applying the criteria and principles endorsed in terms of the reasoning judicial ruling, and in particular based on the interpretation given through the judgments of regular courts disputed before the Court, found the same criteria and principles that have been addressed and responded to all the fundamental claims of the pre-consultations filed through the response in the indictment, respectively, and the request for extraordinary reevaluation of the judicial decision, and found that the verdict brought against the Supreme Court, is not at odds with the terms of Kosovo Republic's constitution, the Constitutional Court is said in the Constitutional Court.
The following “, in terms of linking the Office for Energy Regulatory claims with the tribunal's findings in the Ko93/21 Act, with pre-complicator Blerta Deliu-Codra and 12 other deputies, the Act explains that this case differs in a way that differs from the actual circumstances, among other things, because in the case of Ko93/21, the Court had assessed the constitutionality of the recommendations [N08. -R-01] of May 6, 2021 of the Republic of Kosovo's Parliament, under which (Koron) was authorized The STT to cover electricity deviations in four (4) municipalities of the Republic of Kosovo, exploiting revenues from its own budget, means that will be compensated “by dyvisanda or any other possible” mechanism; and (ii) the Government of Kosovo (i) was forced, within a six-month term, to ensure the entire process of entry into the billing system, according to rules and laws in power, in co-operation with responsible parties, for the luck of consumers in four (4) relevant municipalities with electrical energy,<> said the report.
“Following the clarifications given in the Ko93/21 Act, the Court had found that the controversial act of the Assembly is not in conflict with the relevant provisions of the Constitution, among other things, because the difference in dealing with the consumers of electricity based on residence (i) follows the legitimate goal of implementing the Locking Agreement with the ENTSO-E, according to the European Network of Operators of the Transmission System for Electric Energy; and (i) was temporary nature. Taking into account the legal provisions, legitimate purpose and the consistency of the contested act of the Assembly, including the Government's obligation to address the issues related to the relevant billing system, the Court had estimated that the same was proportional to the goal followed”, becomes known further.












