Selmanaj: This isn't self-preservation, the process has begun perversely.

Democratic League of Kosovo MP Driton Selmanaj has criticised the position regarding the process of duty in justice. He said there are dilemmas whether all issues that have been discussed over the years are involved in this process.

According to Selmanaj, the whole process has been launched against the ground.

The I-information process or reform in the justice system has now long been done not only the common ravages of all political parties, but I think that many issues have rightly been raised that we have had about the position of justice in Kosovo. To tell you the truth, I have my dilemmas if we are addressing what we have been talking about for many years in Kosovo. Are you addressing the issues with which the justice system in Kosovo is regulated? Unfortunately, I think not. Why is this happening? Because I have the conviction that this process has begun an honorable evil colleague”, Selmanaj said.

The criticism he also had for sending the concept-document for property in justice to the Venice Commission by the Government of Kosovo.

He said it has been an unprecedented case of sending five options to this commission.

“What the Ministry of Justice has done is that it has sent a concept-document to the Venice Commission in the wake of property options in Kosovo. The almost unprecedented case, as the government must submit an option, its political view of how it views improving the justice system in Kosovo, but this has sent it with five options. To surprise the recommendations that have come out of the Venice Commission with these amendments today, none of the minister's options have been reflected here, which suggests that none of the issues this Government has considered as important public policy for the justice system have been reflected in amendments”, he said.

The political party commission has proposed that an element, which is to measure integrity, is vulnerable to the dismissal of judges and prosecutors. But the Constitutional Court has just told us that you cannot do this because it reduces human freedoms and rights defined with chapter 2”, the LDK deputy said.

This is not veto, nor is it used anywhere. This is not self-being. This is an attempt to rehabilitate political naturivists all, not only of a political party before public opinion”, he said further.

In addition, Selmanaj said he would vote in favour of adopting amendments to property in justice.