Innocent people in retrial two accused for causing the resulting police court accident

After reading the indictment by prosecutor Ersan Qavolli, the two high-ranking indictees were acquitted in the face of charges of endangering public traffic, as well as failing to help the injured person in the public traffic disaster, reports the “Act on Justice”.

Under these circumstances, the chairman of the court, Shaqa Curri, announced to the parties and their defenders regarding the request to drop the indictment and the rejection of evidence and that in the 30-day term.

In the first trial, the two defendants were sentenced to 15 years (joined) by the Pec Foundation Court.

The first - degree ruling had confirmed that the Court of Appeals had confirmed, but the Supreme Court had approved the demands for the protection of Duraku's legality, so that the Act of Foundation, and that of Appeals had been cancelled, and the case had turned into a first degree retrial.

Otherwise, at the April 3, 2023 session, the two accused Arton and Nezir Duraku pleaded guilty to the criminal acts they were charged with.

In contrast, according to the indictment filed on March 2, 2023, by Pec's Founding Prosecutor, it is said that defendant Arton Duraku, on November 21, 2022, in the village of Jasanica of Cline City, breaking the law on public trafficking causes the deceased F. St.

According to the indictment, until the defendant, without a driver's license, was leading the branding truck “Mercedes Atego”, which was unregistered and not technically regular, as soon as he reached the upper village of Skenderaj Kline, does not adjust the speed of moving to the conditions of the road and exceeds it by 50km/h how much it was allowed to over 90km/h and moves to the left in the anti-circusion tape, where he was rolling with his branding vehicle <x> the F.S.ch.ch.ch.ch.ch. where the first to hit the frontal car”, where the first victim was suffered from the frontalcth car.

According to the indictment, the defendant, Arton Duraku, reportedly committed a criminal offence “The threat of public trafficking” by Article 370 pars. 5 connected to par. One to KPRK.

In the meantime, further in the indictment, it is said that, at the site and high-term, defendant Arton, as truck driver “Mercedes Atego”, does not offer help to the other person who was injured in the traffic accident caused by the defendant's truck, resulting in the death of victim F. Sh, where, after the accident described, he stops the truck and along with his parent, defendant Nezir Duraku, exits the truck near the victim but offers no help and leaves the scene while the victim changes lives.

And with that it is said that the defendant has Arton Duraku has committed a criminal offense “the failure to help the person injured in the public traffic disaster” by Article 374 pars. 3 KPRK.

While defendant Nezir Duraku charged the indictment that in the event described above, it does not offer help to the other person whose life has taken place at direct risk even though he could do so without any serious danger to himself or the other.

In addition, it is said that after defendant Arton Duraku causes a truck traffic accident where defendant Nezir was a passenger in it, exit the truck, approach the victim, but offer no help and leave the scene while the victim changes lives.

In this case, defendant Nezir Duraku is said to have committed a criminal offence “a failure to assist” by Article 188 par.4 KPRK's.