a minute agoHoxhaj: If Kurt claims to have had complete control in the north, why did Banjska happen?
Periskopi(a year ago)
(a year ago)Enver Hoxhaj, deputy chairman of the Kosovo Assembly from the PDK ranks, has spoken about the issue of extending sovereignty to northern Kosovo. Hoxhaj has asked a rhetorical question. If this (Curt) claims that there really is after full control over the north, why did Banjska happen? When someone controls it, it can't be met [...]
Enver Hoxhaj, deputy chairman of the Kosovo Assembly from the PDK ranks, has spoken about the issue of extending sovereignty to northern Kosovo.
Hoxhaj has asked a rhetorical question.
If this (Curt) claims that there really is after full control over the north, why did Banjska happen? When someone's controlling it, someone can't attack. If he claims he is behind and has full control with police in the north, sovereignty was extended. Then why did Iber-Lepenci. I think both cases show the opposite of the government's narration” ♫ Hoxhaj said.
On the other hand, Hoxhaj has estimated that the armed attack on Banjska has shown that Serbia has given up the political solution.
For me, aggression in Banjska has the market that Serbia has moved from political resolution. Serbia is seeking to use violent means to annex Kosovo's north. And, you have a government that is failing to protect Kosovo's north”, Hoxhaj said in an interview for ATV television.
