Tahiri: The government has blocked municipalities. It has forgotten social dialogue.

Through a reaction at Facebok, Tahiri has said that when a duty is delivered, his financing should be secured.

The fulfillment of the collective contract by municipalities, which are neither parties to the contract nor included in municipal policy, is unfair, because every time a obligation is carried, his financing” must also be secured, Tahiri said.

Full response:

The government, has blocked municipalities. He has forgotten social dialogue.

Every citizen of the country should first be announced that the collective contract linked between the Ministry of Education ( MAST/MAS) and the United Education, Science and Culture Union (SBASHK) represented the pledge for social dialogue.

It should be stressed that in the collective contract, municipalities and other educational institutions are meant to plan, while the central level offers financial solutions. Linked to 2017 and continued in January 2021, the subsequent government has not since reflected or assisted municipalities. As a result of the disruption of social dialogue by a party that is promoted as social-democrat, in November 2022 has been reported for unilateral interruption of the collective contract. The consequences of this are already felt, even because of a Supreme Court legal opinion referring to the 2008 government's decision and obligations from collective contracts for the teachers' requests for compensation on the basis of qualifications and compensation for inflation during the contract's implementation period, without addressing the interruption.

This has caused significant damage, estimated at up to 35m euros. As a result, bank accounts are being blocked and damaged in the assessment of management by financial auditing. Fulfilling the collective contract by municipalities, which are neither party to contract nor engage in municipal policy, is unfair because every time a obligation is carried, his financing should be secured.

The corresponding court would have to address this topic and issue a quick and meritive decision so that municipalities could be removed from the collective contract and burdens. It should raise constitutional issues when financial autonomy is affected and start bilateral dialogue with the plaintiffs (the sides of the collective contract), as well as with the central level.

In conclusion, the government, giving up and leaving its burden on municipalities, testifies that social dialogue does not exist. It has no concern in resolving its obligations that have remained a burden to municipalities and teachers, doctors and administration.