Commercial Court Breaks Down Decision on A Street

The Comercial Court's First Chambers Act has been turned down for suspending work on the “A” road.

The Court's announcement reportedly approved the indictee's complaints, OSHPía and interested Pristina municipality parties and economic operator “Sa Perëndia”

Meanwhile, the plaintiff's request “has been rejected. == sync, corrected by elderman == St. P.K. for delaying the execution of April 19, 2023.

“APROVORE as being based on complaints by the Pristina Procurement Supervisor Organisation, and interested Pristina Communist parties, headquartered in Pristina and O.E. “KPS in Kacanic, The Comercial Court Act, First Stair Rooms .C.A., KA.N.181/23, of the date 30.11.2023, as set forth as follows: REFUZAZED as untenable request of plaintiff “Pro & CO Group” St. P.K, headquartered in Gracanica, for delaying the execution of the P.N.144/23 P.D. date 19.04.23 of the Procurement Manager”, it says in place.

The report says that “against this act in the legal term has filed a complaint with the criminally-discussive Organising Organising Organization, due to the fundamental violations of the procedure's provisions, wrong and incomplete confirmation of the actual situation, and the wrong application of material law, with proposals for the court to approve the complaint as based, to change the act. No. There.nr.181/23 of the date 30.11.23 so that the suitor's request “Pro & CO Group”, Sh.p.k, for delaying the execution of the PS. No. 144/23, 1904.2023”

Against the act of the First Stair Chambers, complaints have also prompted Pristina municipality and economic operator “Sa Perëndia”

“Anke against the ruling KA.r.181-23 on the 30.11.203 of the Contemporary Court, first-scale Chambers of Administration Affairs, have also set forth interested Pristina Commission and Sa God Schp.k (now interested parties). The Pristina municipality has struck the ruling because of the wrong and incomplete findings of the actual situation, the wrong implementation of material rights and violation of the procedure's provisions, so it proposed that the court approve the complaint as based, be changed act. There.nr.181/23 of the date 30.11.23 so that the suitor's request “Pro & CO Group”, Sh.p.k, for delaying the execution of the PS. No. 144/23 1904,2023. While the other interested party, Sa Goda Sch.p.k, has filed the complaint due to the substantial violation of the procedure's provisions, the wrong confirmation of the actual situation, and the wrong implementation of material law, with which it has proposed that the complaint be approved as a base, be annulled of the KA.N.181/03 Act of the 3111.2023 Contemporary Court, the Pre-Decident Chamber for Administrative Affairs. ”

The Second Stair Chambers are also said to appreciate that the attitude and conclusion of the first-degree court is not fair and as such cannot be accepted.

The Supreme Court's <x0... Coral Chambers of Second Scales, from this state of affairs, estimates that the conclusion and position of the first-degree court is not fair and can't be accepted as such, since the accepted act is involved in violating the constitutional procedures of Article 181 par.1. 2 points (N) of the LPK, because the accepted act contains shortcomings because the reasons for crucial facts are unclear and contradictory”