Tent 2.5 million of Opera and Ballet: The ministry again recommends the company that favoured the procedure

The Culture Ministry has opened a tender on October 28th, 2022, for the idea project, but which has not yet been finalised.

The Tent That Weights 2.5m eurosIt's definitely called:“Developing technical documentation-of-the-art design of architecture and engineering for the construction of Kosovo Opera and Ballet Theatre in Pristina, in the Republic of Kosovo”.

To link a contract for this job, tenderIt must be assessed in two stages. The assessment of technical documentation and then become the most favourable financial offer.

In August 2023, the Ministry of Culture made assessment of technical documentation and made it The ranking of three selective companies.

One of them is Clearly the most distinct of the other two.

By August 11th, the ministry's procurement has made an announcement on the ruling of the Compacting Authority, in which he has published the results of the evaluation commission regarding this tender procedure.

First place with most points has the code with Cody. 6842 Which took 71 points, second code. 0703 Which has scored 54.2, and the figure 2008 In third place, it has scored 51.4 points.

With this decision The figures of second and third countries, namely 0703 and 2008, have not been reconciled, considering that the Commission has committed violations during the assessment.

The ministry has considered their complaints and found that some of the complaints remain. Thus, it has decided to annul the decision and turn the process into re-evaluation again.

The ministry recommends again the figure "6842" even now, with one point more

Despite the complaint it has been that the 6842 tender It is not in line with the tender procedures because the winner's name has been clearly marked in the 1.5-page exhibit material from the front to the last.

Furthermore, the document has been named “Grober Opera )WB-Boards”

So, that's where the offer is delivered. is not done anonymously and that the applicant Commission knew exactly c.Ila company is being assessed with more points. In this case the offer has had to be eliminated from the start. Despite that, however, the Commission had targeted him with the most points.

The same is true in a recommendation / date document September 7, 2023, where it is again recommended for design, the company to which there are complaints of illegal profit in the project (which you can specifically see below) even this time, the company is appreciated at one more point: A total of 72.

( See THE DOCENTENT OF PLOTH) 

Responding to this complaint point, the Contracting Authority has acknowledged that It's a violation, but has given a scandalous explanation, saying that two other bids have discovered the names of the company.

“In terms of the claim that the two economic operators who have filed reexamination requirements, which refer to the identifying elements found in the digital file of the 6842 operator, the Accounting Authority, after accepting the request for review, has concluded that there are some identifying elements that have all operators have been observed, respectively, in the three files. They're exactly elaborized as follows: The operator 6842, which is presented in these claims, the identification element has appeared as the logo on the operator's name in 3D drawing panels (1.5). Exhibitation Materials -6 Panels), just in the digital version; The operator 0703, the identification element appears in report 1. 4 Dejan Approach& Methodology Report, page 43, description of the project, part of the description of the microalgae system (7.6 Microalgae system), where it refers by name to a preliminary project... Given the great importance of the project, the Contractive Authority has come to the conclusion that these findings can qualify as non-substantiary deviations which did not oppose the girl, the LPP's 4th point at power”,Light among the rest on The Ministry's explanation for this case.

Among other things, companies have complained that neither the delivery of bids from Number 6842 has not been constantatedSo in closed envelopes, after all they've been open and her logo is covered with a piece of paper where the code was.

Article 80 of the Public Procure Law - The LPP, which is called “The composition and decision making of the Jury”, has clearly determined that revealing the identity of participants in the race is legal violations.

The point of this article specifically says: “Jury will decide on the competition only on the criteria outlined in announcing the design competition. The identities of participants will not be revealed before members of the jury”.

It also runs counter to the rule of 01,2022 for public procurement, specifically with Article 55.14, 55.16, 55. 17 of this regulation.

Based on the complaint directed at the Ministry's procurement, it is seen that the second selected offer by the commission, by the figure of 0703, has had to be eliminated. This is because at technical bidding, this company has not respected the construction line.

Basically, it's come up with drawings off the construction line even in private parcels.

The ministry has argued that the professional commission has not had documentation on the basis of the available, in which the limit of the available parcel is accurately seen. Still, he has approved this complaining point.

READ MORE ABOUT KIME: The Culture Ministry attempted to proceed illegally for the construction of Opera and Ballet, favouring a company./Periscopi/