Constitutional opening the way, presidency silent over chief prosecutor's decree

The presidency has not indicated what decision President Vjosa Osmani will make about the decree of Blerim Isufaj as chief state prosecutor, as the Constitutional Court deemed his counterCandidate complaint, Albanian Fazliu, in vain. Fazliu's lawyer says the Constitution has failed to assess at all whether the process has been legal. Until [...] connoisseur
The presidency has not indicated what decision President Vjosa Osmani will make about the decree of Blerim Isufaj as chief state prosecutor, as the Constitutional Court deemed his counterCandidate complaint, Albanian Fazliu, in vain. Fazliu's lawyer says the Constitution has failed to assess at all whether the process has been legal. While the connoisseur of justice cases says the whole process is now in the hands of the president. An episode of the long drama of the state chief prosecutor has ended.
Following the lack of chief prosecutor now 1 year and 5 months and the procrastination of the new chief prosecutor, the process also emerged from the reins of the Constitutional Court. Blerim Isufaj's counterCandor, Albanian Fazliu, was earlier addressed to the Constitution with the claim that the Prosecutorial Council for the selection of Isufaj had violated his guaranteed rights and freedoms with the Constitutions and the European Convention for Human Rights”.
Since the Constitutional Court, Appely and the Supreme, had decided that the indictment was inconsequential, while the Constitution had ascertained this the day before. The Constitutional decision states that the Supreme Court, related to the ruling of appeal and foundation, is not against “the right to fair and impartial judgment”
But Albania's lawyer Fazlius has told Dukagjin that they have no comment on the decisions of this institution, except that it has not been linked to the selection process, but only the description of preliminary decisions.
So the Constitutional Court has failed to assess whether the selection process was legal or illegal. This case is no different from the previous cases that this court has addressed, such as Laura Pula and Shyqira Syla, who don't know anything about our case and are identical. It remains now in the discretion of the president of the Republic of Kosovo to finally render his assessment, if this process was fair and merity”, has been thrown out by Flagon Sylejmani.
On the other hand, lawyer Ardian Bajract has clarified the importance of deadlines in jurisdiction, while saying the president must now make a decision. “Aphaes are alpha and omega of judicial processes. You may be right, but if you respect the deadlines, then you're lost. There is already no reason to drag away the matter of decreeing or not of the chief state prosecutor. So the case is exclusively in the hands of the president of state”, Bajraktari said.
President Vjosa Osmani himself has stated that she is waiting for the depletion of all legal ways to make a decision, while on Saturday the presidency has not had an answer about when this process will be completed. Otherwise, acts of power, and the prime minister himself have greatly coveted and disputed the name of Blerim Isufaj, elected by the KKP to the chief prosecutor, claiming Isufajn does not want the three state leaders in this position.












