Money counterfeiter: 100 false euros could identify another child

On the other hand, the same man told us that he had previously worked in the apartment of accused Avdullah Pacolli and that while he was working he had seen some expander radio where he had now asked the accused if he could sell, who had agreed for 200 euros.

Regarding the payment, witness Kondzhel has stated that the money was agreed to pay to a gas pump “Patron” and that he had just gone home to get the same one.

The accused Avdullah Pacol had told him he was at the time of Janjevo cross and the money of the other accused, Raif Pacolli, then handed him over to Congeel, where Raif had awarded him 200 euros, separated from 100.

On the other hand, witness Kondzhel said that, after two days of Raif's giving the money to Avdulah, police had called Raif, but since they were together, they went together.

Now I don't remember exactly who called us, but I got called by Avdulahi, and we were worried that we never had a job at the P.A.”, witnessed Condzhel said.

After his testimony, the quality of the witness was heard by police official Rizah Grantolli.

Witness Grantolli during his testimony has said it was he and Sergeant Valdet Morina who had written it.

On the other hand, witness Grantwall said that while he was drinking coffee in civilian clothes in the same café where the accused Avdullah was located, he had heard of the counterfeit money until the accused had tried to pay him a coffee, and the waiter told him that he was breaking it up because they were forged.

While Witness Grantolli heard this conversation after being near, he had immediately been summoned by colleague Morina and had immediately taken to a street where they had seen the accused, who, according to him, was very cooperative and the coin they had suspected was forged along with the accused, had taken him and gone to the police.

Parasely, Judge Bahtiri has asked the two accused about guilt, with the same charges being declared innocent.

And after Pacolli's statement by the accused, the opening word has been given in this trial, where prosecutor Yavorka Perlinkevic has said that, Pristina Constitutional Prosecutor, the Department of Criminal Crimes, in case of establishing the indictment of January 17th 2017 against the high-ranking indictees in the direction of conducting criminal work “Forging money” has provided sufficient evidence to prove the accused committed a criminal act.

While defender Avdullah Pacolli, Mentor Neziri, has stated that they consider the indictment filed against his defender, there is no evidence of any material or personal that would prove the actual state as described in the indictment, much less the qualifications for which he is charged.

And the defender of the accused Raif Pacolli, lawyer Valon Sadiku, among other things, said he believes the prosecution has offered no evidence in which it would prove her claim in relation to the indictment against his client, which during the trial will prove that his defense did not perform this work.

After the opening word, the trial has continued with the administration of evidence, with the prosecutor's case backed from reading earlier statements of defendants and witnesses.

As for the investigation report, the report from the site of the event, as well as the police reports, said they are part of the criminal conglomerate, which explains how the case has taken place from the moment of its appearance either from the moment Rizah Granotelli was found at the scene, while in terms of the Forenzice report, the same proves that the case has been proven false.

And after managing evidence and hearing of witnesses, defense has been given by accused Avdullah Pacolli.

During his defense, the defendant Pacolli said that he sold it to witness Condzhel and told him that he would deliver tomorrow, as he was going to Slovi to his grandfather, and that the next afternoon the accused Raif had called him and given him 200 euros, where he was with his brother, and Raif alone.

On the other hand, the same man said that he took 200 euros (partial from 100 euros), the next day until he tried to pay a coffee with one of those 100 euros, the waiter told him they were breaking it because they were fake.

In this regard, the defendant said that he paid the other 100 and he said he was headed to the bank to verify, but he had met a relative on the way and the same guy stopped for coffee, and that the police had then come to the bank for about 3-5 minutes and told him to tell him everything he had and the first money they had told him about 100 is worthless.

He added that he couldn't see that the bill was forged.

On the other hand, he added that once he arrived at the police he had called the other defendant Raif, where he told him that if he could get to the police in Lipjan to clear up about the money he had given him.

It's been noon since 3 to 5 p.m., and I was with my brother and Raif was himself, but exactly the clock s.

Afterward, the lawyer Sadiku faced the same with the public's statement in the Prosecutor.

You answered “this money. Did you get it immediately?

The defendant said that he could say it that way, but he cannot exactly remember it because it may have been morning or afternoon, and Brother Shaqir Pacolli is also witnessing about it.

On the other hand, the same has again been confronted with his statement given to the Prosecutor on December 20, 2016, where asked “then where you went with these before “, the accused responded to “with the money I went to get a coffee at a bar, which is on the way where I had my apartment. That's where I ordered a coffee, and when the waiter came by to pay the fee, I didn't have enough money, but I gave him 100 euros, one of the coins from Raif”.

Lawyer Sadiku has asked what the truth was about what he said he immediately went to the cafe and tried to pay the 100-euro fee Raif gave him, or the statement he issued in this investigation that he went to the cafe the next day, or that he went to Hyvali that day.

In this regard, the accused Pacolli said that as he declared earlier, he went to the cafe the next morning, and that day he went that day that his mother in Heival.

Under these circumstances, since it was time to pause, as well as defender of accused Raif Pacolli, the lawyer Sadiku, had a session at Ferizaj, today's session was interrupted as its follow-up is expected to take place tomorrow (4 August 2023).

Otherwise, while the defendant Avdulah Pacolli was giving protection, the other accused Raif Pacolli had recently stayed in the hall until this release was observed by Judge Alltane Murseli. But then by Judge Bahtiri he was forced to free the hall.

Otherwise, this case was previously judged by Judge Alban Ajvazi, while on the occasion of passing Judge Gazmend Bahtiri to the Ra's Crime Department among other subjects, the case has been shared, where it is now judged by the same and members Allen Murseli and Gizim Ademi.

According to the indictment compiled on January 17th 2017, Avdullah Pacolli on August 18, 2016, on the path “George Fista”, in Lipjan, had stopped at a restaurant and after ordering coffee, paid for it with 100 counterfeit euros, where the waiter noticed it, had returned it to the defendant and had immediately notified the police, who had found this bill and confiscated it during the raid.

The accused Raif Pacolli, however, is suspected of having given Avdullah Pacolli the 100 - dollar bill, which the same had put in circulation on 13 August 2016.

For these actions, they are being charged with criminal work “The counterfeiting of money” from Article 302, KPRK's paragraph 2, which is sentenced to prison terms of one (1) to eight (8) years.