8 minutes agoThe Ministry's Prosecutor's Office addresses the Technical Faculty for expertise on the Gjilan Highway
Periskopi(3 years ago)
(3 years ago)By 2018 the Ministry of Infrastructure had begun to build the A7.1 Highway, also known as the Gjilan Highway. Besides procrastination of the hard work being done there, in some parts the work is not being done by standards. Periscop has reported that in the second segment of the road, the quality of asphalt does not [...]
On the second segment of the highway, the contract has required that asphalt be laid with eropetic stones but has been paved with the lowest quality of limestone.
“does not know the concrete situation correctly; it must be done by law. We are in co-operation with the University of Pristina on super road expertise. There are the supervisory parties, in this case contract managers. In such situations as political authority we cannot intervene, but what we can do, we can engage professional authority that is higher, more competent to make professional decisions on what should be done in these cases. So in cooperation with the University of Pristina to do super expertise for most of the projects we have. What measures need to be taken, a field expert” needs to be taken, the minister said.
It does not seem that the minister is reported to the fact that it is not in the capacity of the ministry to send for expertise, the findings which are only recorded by the ministry's laboratory, and then by a laboratory in Croatia.
Periscope has learned that the super expertise is becoming the purpose of covering contract violation by contractor and project manager who, if proven payment for the inadequate gravel layer, violated the contract at 22.2.
Pay Tests
22.1 The contractor will hand over the manager of the month-to-day project report on the estimated 9-dollar jobs completed by a pre-convenient minus quantum sum.
22.2 Project manager will check the work done for him. Confirming the Quality of Work And it proves the amount to be paid to contractors.
The contract does not provide for resolving violations through technical experts or any super expertise.
The 1.12 point of the contract correctly defines as below that the contractor would ensure the quality of jobs and the quality of materials used to perform contracted jobs, the Ministry should otherwise withdraw the guarantee of contractors for failure to perform the quality of jobs and for failing to achieve the quality of materials used to perform contracted jobs.
General terms of contract
- Twelve. Insurance for Fulfilling the Agreement
12.2 The contractor will ensure that things will begin and end at a set time in the contract, professionally and in accordance with regulations and
The technical standards that we engineering apply to similar jobs.
12,3 The employer ensures that all the jobs he will perform, as well as improving defects during the performance, will be done in time and professionally by qualified professionals.
12.4 The contractor would provide for the quality of jobs and the quality of materials used to perform contracted jobs.
12.5 The contractor will pay the insurance for meeting the contract in the set amount, as well as until the set term required as in the tender file.
The contract correctly conditions how to act:
6.8 If after testing, the contractor finds that the quality of materials is not of the quality of the specified materials, it has the right to require the contractor to change the material without changing the contracting price.
7. Correcting defects
a. If the project manager notices any defects in performing tasks as quickly as possible and without delay, he will be writing to the contractor to eliminate defects.
b. The contractor will eliminate the defects and achieve the right quality of work within the time set by the manager of the project, and this will be achieved without changing the contract price.
Any other solution to be offered through the University of Pristina's super expertise is a violation of the contract. The very commitment of the super expertise that the UP is in violation of the contract.
As you can see, the minister's goal is to have through professors at the Faculty of Buildings, or Technical Faculty, offer extenuating solutions to the contractor where they will provide price-reducing solutions because of not achieving that the quality of the works, which may hypothetically be worth about 20 thousand symbolic euros that would be lowered to contractors.
On the other hand, with simple reading on the Internet, it is noted that the change of stone endangers traffic safety because the eropative stone has greater resistance to lemation (polysification) than the limestone that is fast polished and does not offer good cofficiency cofficiency in braking.
A few days ago, Periscop reported that experts at the UP faculty have already been committed to prove some work done and unworked at the Highway's 4 (lot four) headquarters. , Except they are not committed by the ministry, but by the Prosecutor. /M. B Periscope/
