Bon Vivalt case, police officially search Dukagjin Nikolla

It is being requested for “severe attempted assassination”, “Cause of general risk”, “Use of weapons or dangerous vehicle”, “Keeping control or unauthorized possession of weapons”.

Duke is one of the people involved in the gunfight at the “Bon Vivant” bar, where one person was killed and 20 others were injured.

The prosecutor's file detailing how the Bon Vivant assassination occurred

According to the late prosecutor Kastriot Ramadani was sitting in the local with Dukagjij Nikolaj and a still unidentified person from the prosecution while at that point “Bon Vivant” Andy Pajaziti and Gzim Zakuti had entered.

“There is a doubt based on the fact that by August 4th, 2023 around 23:17, at the “Ban Vivant” street on “Recep Luci” in Pristina, following a physical clash between defendants Andy Pajaziti and Gzim Zakuti on one side with defendants Dukagjit Nikolay, Kastriot Ramadani and now the late Kastriot Ramadani and the unidentified person on the other side, with the intent to deprive each other of life in the local way while the defendants were sitting down, Kastriot, and now felt like the highest-ranking person who has been sitting in the Pasciusari and delusovici are now standing in the most likely to find out of the fugitive.

The prosecution claims that Andy Pajaziti, known as <x0thalian” and Dukagjin Nikollaj, had begun to fight physically. Later, the late Ramadan had hit Pajazit with a glass bottle, and the latter had already shot in the direction of the victim.

“at that point, to note that the defendants were entered by the local defendants Andy Pajazit and Gzim Zakuti, at that moment, the late Kastriot Ramadani pulled the firearm out of his belt and the defendant Dukagjin Nicolaj pulled the firearm out of a hand bag, so that for a moment the gun of fire begins to physically fight Andy Pajaziti with defendant Dukay Nikolaj, after Kastriot Ramadan with a glass bottle on his head several times Andy Pajazi, in that moment Andy pulls out the fire gun from his belt and in front of Ramadan's row, and the defendants with the gun-fire in PEqirat/Eqitstrajrat and the rest of the Tex/Epex-Chi'shus Phat.

The prosecution points out that in the “Bon Vivant” there has been a major threat to people's lives, Friday night.

The injured “: G.H., A.Z., A.A., and N.N., who have suffered bodily injuries from rockets thrown by fire, and also body injuries have been sustained by defendants Andy Pajazit, Hisoni Gecaj, and the late Kastriot Ramadani who died of his wounds at QKUK. While broken glass and glass glasses and leaving have also injured 14 girls”, the prosecution points out.

The alleged “have caused widespread danger to people's lives, and later the defendants have managed to flee the scene and hide weapons”, the prosecution found.

The prosecution claims that Andy Pajaziti committed criminal acts “grave murder”, “the use of weapons or dangerous vehicle” and “cause general risk”.

The defendants, Andy Pajaziti, Dukagjin Nikolaj and Hisni Gecaj, have according to the prosecution held weapons contrary to the applicable law for weapons.

The prosecution points out that Andy Pajaziti and Dukagji Nikolj weapons have used them as a tool for committing criminal acts, while defendant Hisni Gecaj has kept an unauthorized possession of a knife by acting contrary to the applicable law on weapons.

With this alone each committed criminal work “ownership, in unauthorized control or possession of weapons”, the prosecution claims.

According to the prosecution, Dukagjin Nikollaj, who is on the run, is also suspected of committing criminal work “severe attempted murder”.

Always, relying on prosecution claims Hisni Gecaj is also suspected of criminal activity “participating in beating” and Gezim Zakuti for “participating in beating”.

The prosecution estimates that conditions have been met for imposing the detention measure against them, “because if they are found in freedom they will approach the fugitive to avoid criminal responsibility”.

The prosecution also points to the fact that defendants are recivilists of criminal acts.