Wessel's defense: Judges ' questions are biased.

That was because Emmerson did not agree with the questions the judges had addressed to the Mustafa Road.

Emmerson said it was his duty to challenge the biased questions.

From my jurisdiction, it is my attorney's duty to challenge the biased questions on all sides, regardless of which side, including judges. In today's case, my opposition to the questions asked by the judges was violated, and there must be a decision. Judge Metro gave me orders to sit down, and my opposition was removed from the transcript because we were speaking at the same time”, Emmerson said.

He claims he has a professional obligation to reject it.

I don't want the situation to deteriorate, but have a clear process. If the judges are prepared for counter-question, we saw this misdirected the witness, it went out of context. It is a professional obligation to object. And if the court thinks it shouldn't be done, you have to come up with a decision on this”, Emmerson said.