British Professor: Rewrite borders best solution, it's not as dangerous as autonomy

British professor in “London School of Economics”, James Ker-Landsey, former supporter of the territorial exchange idea between Kosovo and Serbia, solutions this only “”, according to him between the two states, has come up with a video about the recent events in the northern part of the country, where it has again relaxed the same idea: “Koha [...]
British professor in “London School of Economics”, James Ker-Lindsey, former supporter of the territorial exchange idea between Kosovo and Serbia, resolution this only “” according to him between the two states, has come up with a video about the recent events in the northern part of the country, where he has again relaxed the same idea: “Time to discuss the divide? ” has named his video.
Ker-Lindsey, spells out a series of arguments about why you think that way. “There is nothing in international law against two states that voluntarily set their own limits”. As for the fact that changing borders is non-European, he remembers the Northern Ireland Agreement built on open recognition of the change of borders between the United Kingdom and Ireland when the majority of the population in Northern Ireland did so.
Change of borders, the British professor says, also releases Kosovo in changing its Constitution in parts where Serbs are given excessive powers.
Subsequently, while clear preference remains that of an autonomous arrangement (for Serbs), partition is not as radical or as dangerous as it may seem. There are even more supporters than you can think of”.
Until many public officials have rejected the idea, they privately know what advantages it brings”, he continues.












