28 accused in case of knowledge as “patent drivers”, have been declared innocent of criminal acts

In this case, the blame for corruption and other criminal acts rejected it: Naser Llugaliu, Veretta Ajvazi, Flora Ferizi, Adem Binakaj, Leratat Shehu, Agim Restelica, Flamur Lekaj, Shaban Zuka, Eduard Brahimli, Dragan Zivkovic, Naser Biseli, Azem Miftar, Labin Ajeti, Magbule Mehmeti, Avdush Tokali, Pem Tolali, Selimustemi, Fatos Fersi, Besfort Pozhi, Naqi, Saqi, Saqeretje, Lafimqi, Murmir Ramaz, Fatzi, Fatkai, Fatkali, Fenderez, Fende, Fenderez, Fendedenz, and Luz Berdez.

The plea about guilt, the defendants have made after being considered and read the indictment, but at the request of the defender of the accused Shaban Zuka, lawyer Shemsije Sheholli, prosecutor Bashqaba Zeqaj read the indictment point regarding her defense.

Judge Fatime Dermaku announced the parties have the right to apply for dropping the indictment and rejecting evidence in the 30-day term.

In this case, along with 28 those quoted above are being charged with Burim Jashar, Feyzulah Ejupi and Bashjetu Jetullahu, for whom criminal proceedings are set aside (for each single person).

Judge Dermak took the decision through which the hearing concerning the plea agreement between the Prosecutor and accused Burim Jashar appointed him to be held on September 11, 2023.

For the accused Ejupo, Judge Dermak appointed the initial session on June 29, 2023, while for the Jewish Union, he has isolated the procedure because the same is found abroad.

Earlier, in this hearing, the defender of the accused, Feyzullah Ejupi, lawyer Behar Ejupi, announced to the court that the prosecution had failed to meet the legal condition and had failed to supply the same paperwork. He asked the court to order the Prosecutor to supply the same paperwork.

According to the indictment compiled on March 31, 2021, by Pristina's Founding Prosecutor, between the period of April 17th until July 5th 2019, on the first device, indictee Naser Llugaliu is said to be the co-ordinator of Pristina's patent centre, defendant Storeta Ajvazi in the position of administrative assistant of the centre, defendant Fejzulah Epi, in the position of administrative official at the centre, defendant Shaban Zuka, in the position of security guard near this centre: Ademi Binakaj, Leratat Shehu, Agim Restelica, Flamur Lekaj, Edward Brahimaj, Dragan Zivkovic, Nasser Bislimi, Azem Miftari, Labinot Ajeti, Magbule Mehmeti, Selim Garustemi, Fatos Ferizi and Besfort Pozheg, in the position of the examiners of the theoretical or practical exam under the Ministry of Infrastructure, that all official persons in Persistently exploiting or passing their authority and failing to fulfill their official duties with the intention of the benefit of the law.

In an indictment, during the implementation of secret measures, it has been found that the superiors have been correcting the theoretical tests through offices, without camera monitoring and non-communication commissions in opposition to the Ministry of Infrastructure's mandatory administrative directives and have enabled the passage of patent candidates without meeting pre-cautious driving points, where the assigned candidates have met theoretical tests as well as in some cases have intervened in candidates' tests, in order to have the same points needed to pass the test for different drivers, but also in a practical way that they have been able to pass the test and test and test in this way that they have been able to pass with the pre-exacipitative tests that have been passed in the pre-rectorial tests that have been passed on unincidented.

The same, charged with performing criminal work “Use of official position or authority” Article 414 in continuation and co-ordination from Article 31 and 77 of KPRK's.

Take, in the second slide, defendants Avdush Topalli and Premim Topalli, at the time, at the first point of the device, the first defendant of the Auto-Scholl owner “Flora” with headquarters in Pristina, while the second defendant in the position of the instructor in this car, once the son of the first defendants, who both directly sought and received an undeserved gift in order to act in violation of the task of their economic activity, so that the candidates who have been interested in having been equipped with the first drivers, mainly of different categories, 400x2D, were obtained by a third euro driver, with a license device.

Also, in the indictment it is said that the same in co-operation with officials of the Ministry of Infrastructure, the Office of Drivers in Pristina, the aforementioned defendants have enabled the candidates to conduct the practical and theoretical test by being given money, where, by the application of secret measures, top defendants have been found to have talked to the candidate, F.B. And it has been agreed that for patented medical license equipment “D”, the candidate must pay 1,000 euros, including the practical and theoretical test, as well as the release of the medical certificate without even having presented the candidate for conducting medical examinations, where the same date the candidate paid avans 200 euros and the rest had to pay for the positive outcome, where on July 5, 2019 the candidate entered the theory test, but because of some internal developments in the driver's department has not passed the theory.

The same, charged in co-ordination, have committed criminal summer “accepting bribes in the private sector” Article 309, par. 1 connected to KPRK Article 31.

In turn, according to the third device, the defendant Flora Feriz, in time and place like the first point of the device, in the quality of administrative assistant at Pristina's Patenta Shopre Centre, reportedly did not announce the criminal work she learned during her duty exercise, even though she had been aware of the identity of the perpetrators, since the implementation of secret measures had been found that in her presence the theoretical tests had been corrected and filled out of the exams, without surveillance of cameras and commissions, as had occurred when there were actions of the alleged Naserpullusllus, Lestelic and Lekä, described in the same telephone application as having been contacted by the telephone calls, as having been contacted by the same calls, as having been contacted by the same calls from the police.

For these actions, the same is charged with committing criminal wine “not warning of criminal acts or their perpetrators” from Article 378, par.1 of KPRK.

According to the fourth device of the indictment, defendants Avdush Topalli, Premim Topalli and Burim Jashari, at the time and place as at the first point of the device of this indictment, defendants have issued the document on behalf of the other person without their authorization, respectively, the medical certificate in which they figure the first I.B.B.A., A.K. and H.J., in the way that the third defendant in the manager's character at Ordinance <x0th>-TUR> in Pristina, even with the first defendant of Toplus and the U.K.H.E.E.E.E.E., in the way that the third defendant enabled Topirectors to be presented to the office.

In this case, the same in co-ordination are accused of committing criminal acts against the case of “Special falsification of documents” by Article 391, par.1, points 1.3 concerning KPRK Article 31.

According to the fifth device of this indictment, defendants Naim Thaqi and Syle Beja on May 15th 2019, as official persons using office or official authority have overstepped their powers in the manner that in the quality of official persons, the second anti-law police officials with the intent of illegal profit, so that defendant Naim Thaqi, while at a meeting with defendant Naser Lugaliu, who held the position of co-ordinator of the Centre for the Cheffer's Office in Pristina, initially announces in a case which was investigated by the Criminal Tribunal for Economics in Pristina, while at the office with the defendant's office, while announcing what he was doing in the case to inform the suspect if the suspect had instructed him to do in the case.

Also reportedly, the first defendant reports the defendant Llugaliu that, under the quarter, they have asked for another 60 days, while the second defendant on June 25th 2019, in co-operation with the first defendant during the meeting they had with defendant Llugaliu in his office, the second defendant had initially asked him for a driver's candidate, A.B. To help him get past it because the same one had told him that he had a son of a bank and then the same informs him that he should be careful because there might be something in that office, and that other escort units were engaged by police, asking him to be careful, while on the other hand, they had discovered the secret measures that were being applied in that case.

In this case, the same co-ordination has committed criminal work “Using official position or authority” from Article 414, par. 1 connected to KPRK Article 31.

Take, according to the indictment in the fifth point device 2, at the time, place and the same way as at the first point of the fifth device, defendants Naim Thaqi and Sylla Bey, without authorization, convey to the other person the information that constitutes official secrecy, so that the defendant seen on May 15th 2019, as they have been at the meeting with defendant Naser Lugaliu who held the position of the Co-ordinator for the Orders in Pristina, to whom they were implementing secret measures of the investigation in the conversation, the same thing as related to the actions that are undertaken by the Economic Investigation unit and the Commission, while the two defendants in June, if they have been able to submit to a meeting with him in the other authorities, they have been able to inform them that they have a secret command in their intelligence within a few days, and then they will be able to inform them in a secret unit you in a matter in a matter in a few minutes and then they will be able to inform them that the two indictees of the two others in a matter.We don't want to fall when I have my men.“.

In this case, the same in co-ordination are accused of committing criminal work “The discovery of official secrecy” by Article 426, par. 1 connected to KPRK Article 31.

While, according to the sixth device, defendant Ekrem Latifi is accused of being the examiner's quality at the Ministry of Infrastructural ? The Patenta Shoparies Department has given an unreasonably tip or benefit to the official person, accused Naser Llugaliu in order for that person to act or not, in accordance with his official duty, so that the critical day of the same day through Defrem Bajraj had given 250 euros posted in envelopes with a name written on yellow paper that had been introduced to the driver for that day.

So, with this same charge, it's charged with committing the criminal act of “bribery assets” by Article 422, par.1 of KPRK.

According to the seventh device, defendant Bashkim jetuu is charged that during time, as at the first point of the device of this indictment, in the quality of the Auto school “8 Mars” in Pristina, as a person employed in this private subject, has directly requested and received an undeserved gift, or misused his position by receiving a reward for himself in order to act or fail to act in violation of office, so from the driver's license candidate E.R. He's accepted 100 euros to help him pass the practical driver's license test, instructing the same one that if he doesn't give him a lot of money he'll take it down on his driving test.

The same is accused of committing the criminal act of “accepting bribes to the private sector” by Article 309, par.1 of KPRK.

On the other hand, according to the eighth device, defendant Dritmir Islami is charged as at the first point of the indictment that in the quality of the car instructor “Abis” in Pristina, he has directly requested and received an undeserved gift or misused his position by receiving a reward for himself, in order to act or fail to act in violation of office, so that from the MM driver's license candidate. and her husband I.M. He had accepted 600 euros to help pass the driver's license test, which, according to his instructions, this candidate on the day he entered the theoretical driver's license test was down fourth in a row, and the examiner who had held that test had invited him to lower the bank in front of a case of ready response from which he had copied them, with what evidence he had managed to pass the theoretical test.

So the same one is charged with taking bribes to the private sector “by Article 309, par.1 of KPRK.

In the ninth device of the indictment, defendant Murtez Rama is charged as at the first point of the device of this indictment in the quality of the instructor at the Autoschollus “Rinas” with headquarters, deliberately assisting others in carrying out the criminal acts, Avdus and Premim Topall, respectively, so that with the same actions he has given the equipment to carry out criminal work, and that candidates who have had access to the theory test for driving has been placed on hidden photographers (s), through whom he has sent out the same tests and sent them to the Avdels, who have found their own case with their own telephone examination of Top.

Therefore, the same charge is that he committed a criminal offense “for assisting in carrying out the criminal act” as well as “Copying to the private sector”, from Article 309, par.1, regarding Article 30 of KPR.

On the other hand, according to the 10th device, defendant Hasan Hasan is accused of indirectly offering the first point of the device in the quality of the driver's professional driver's license candidate, recorded in the Auto School “Fit” in Pristina, an indirect reward or benefit to the instructor of this vehicle, Milazizim Demolli, and that amount of 450 euros, on the day he entered the driver's license test, and was informed that Hasani had only met questions, while the rest of him leaving him empty, or not violating him.

So this same case is being accused of committing the criminal act of bribing “in the private sector” by Article 310, par.1, of KPRK.

While, in the 11th device of the indictment, the defendant Milazim Demolli is said to have been employed in Pristina as a person employed in this private sector subject indirectly sought and received an undeserved gift or mistook his position by receiving a reward for himself in order to act or fail to carry on his duty or function during the exercise of economic, financial or trade activity.

In addition, according to this device, driver's driver's license candidate Hasan Hasan has accepted the amount of money of 450 euros to help him pass the theoretical test, instructing him who, in the case of test submission, meets only two answers and others leaves empty.

On the other hand, the same one on July 2, 2019, is said to go to the defendant's office, Naser Llugaliu, and along with it they look at candidate lists that have to submit to the theoretical test and ask Naser that “the kee of the data”, While Naser tells “Of the trees this is” and together identify candidate Hasan Hasani, where he then tells Naser “Bluebox” And he says also that “s requiredW Come on.“)No, no, no.“.

In this case, the same one is accused of committing the criminal act of accepting bribes to the private sector by Article 309, par. One of KPRK.

While, on the device of eleven points two, it is said that on May 2nd, 2019, in the quality of the Auto School's employee “Fiat” in Pristina has offered and given a gift or unreasonable benefit directly to himself or the other official person Naser Llugaliu, so that the same one or not acts in accordance with his official duty, so that during the implementation of the secret measures, it was found that the same one had first gone to Naser's office in Pristina at the Cheffer Center and originally given him some paper and <2>three and a half”, telling about someone, and Naser returns “It's not safe to know who else did it.“, and “Except with what's happening to me.“, whereas defendant returns “And the bottom line is 83.”.

In this case, the same one is accused of committing the criminal work of “Bribery assets” by Article 422, par. 1 KPRK.

Take, according to the 12th device of this indictment, defendant Lindita Hoxha from June 27, 2019 until July 5th 2019, in the quality of the professional driver's driving instructor at Autox0...Atlantida”, has consistently offered and provided gift or rational profit directly to himself or the other official person Naser Lludiliu, co-ordinator of the Centre for the Carves in Pristina, in order that the same action or non-propossional in his office, so during the secret action, is found on June 27th, in the same office of his many euro-marked letters written in the name of the past 300 euro.

According to this device, the same one on July 5, 2019, had again been in the office of defendant Naser Llugaliu and had given him money back where he had taken the money out of his wallet and directly gave it to Lugali by saying “Get rid of me.

In this case, the same is accused of committing the criminal work of “The continued bribery chamber” by Article 422, par. 1 linked to KPRK's Article 77.

And according to the thirteenth device, defendant Enver Fazliu over time as at the first point of the indictment device, in the quality of the Auto School instructor “AAB” in Pristina as a person employed in this private sector subject has directly requested and received an undeserved gift, either misusing his position, receiving a reward for himself in order to act or fail to engage in wrongdoing or office during the exercise of economic, financial or commercial activity.

So, it's said from driver's driver candidate A.G. has accepted the amount of money of 450 euros to help pass the theoretical driver's license test, guiding it in the case of filling the test, she only wrote personal data on the test and left the rest of the test empty, where she had done the same and managed to pass the test for a driver's license.

In this case, the same charge is that it committed the criminal act of “accepting bribes in the private sector” from Article 309, par. One of KPRK.