Charges against Martin Berishaaj exasperate Gervala: No more guesses, you need to get on the table.

Foreign Affairs Minister Donika Grovalla has once again addressed the issue of Albanian Ambassador to Croatia Martin Berisha, who was accused of involvement in a financial scandal in this country. After being asked at the media conference where she sided with her counterpart from Croatia, Gordan Grlic-Radman argued the ambassador to [...]
After being asked at the media conference where she sided with her counterpart from Croatia, Gordan Grlic-Radman argued that the ambassador in question has said what he had to say at the session with the parliamentary commission, and that she is failing to understand how the persons who have adopted his answers with a nod-head have now come against him.
“In agreement with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as well as with the ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Berisha has given his answers to the parliamentary commission where he had to give his statement, I have followed very carefully that session of the parliamentary commission, I have seen that no questions have been left unanswered at that session of the parliamentary commission, and I have seen the approval of the commission members of the Berishaj declarations during that session, and therefore I am more surprised that without waiting and remembering months later, the same people who have been present at that session and who have claimed from any statements to Berisha, and then come out after a whole session that we have all told the others at the news conference, we have told the Pristina.
“I don't believe that Ambassador Berisha has trouble answering our media for sure at a moment when there will be fewer bilateral commitments, we'll call you one day and we'll both stand up, questioning-no problem whatsoever, without any kind of rejection”.
She added that those who are continuing on charges against Berisha is the time to come with facts, and not just speak on assumptions.
But I think there's come a moment when all those who continue the campaign would have to ask themselves, do you think the campaign goes on based solely on assumptions or it's been as long as it takes the facts at the table before we continue with campaigns, with political campaigning against certain persons?












