Supreme: Citizens have a right to ask for money that was billed for the north stream

According to the Supreme Act, consumers who have paid for the energy spent in the north have the right to seek the return of financial means.

Therefore, claims about reasoning and not indicating in the four northern municipalities with security reasons are not sustainable, and do not have access to knowledge reading in that section, because it is not justified that other citizens for these reasons be charged with paying for spent electricity without a legal basis. Therefore, with this fate and payment has become the unfair treatment of Kosovo citizens, which conflicts with Article 55 per cent. 4, of the Constitution, inequitable treatment cited as in the courts of lower institutions, because it has become a restriction on human rights. So based on the 194th article of LMD, consumers, who without legal basis and without their knowledge are billed and paid for the energy spent in the north, were granted the right to return the paid amount as courts of lower institutions”, the Supreme announced.

The Supreme full announcement:

The Supreme Court College has rejected the request for extraordinary review of the court ruling, submitted by ignorance, the Energy Regulatory Office, (ZRRE), against the Act of Court of Appeals AA No. 990/2021.

In the administrative conflict, according to the plaintiff's indictment, the Ombudsman against the indictee, the Energy Regulatory Office, (ZRRE), legal-based annulment of the indictee's decision by setting in motion for extraordinary review of the judicial decision put forward by indicted Z. THREE, against the trial of the Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court's college, at the session, held on March 09, 2023, has rejected the request for extraordinary review of the court ruling, set forth by the ZRRE.

Even the Court of Appeals with the Act of AA No. 990/2021, has turned down the indictee's complaint as groundless, Z RRE, while the Constitutional Court Act in Pristina A.n. 1373/17, he proved it.

The Supreme Court's College on the subject of the investigation finds that the courts of the lowest institutions, right, have proved the actual and fair state of justice have applied material rights to the mode of deployment, respectively, the approval as based on the prosecution of the ombudsman, and the annulment of the lawsuit's decision Z. The RRE, in terms of the fate of citizens of the Republic of Kosovo, has been billed for the spent flow, but unpaid in the four northern municipalities of the Republic of Kosovo, (also since KEDs spent there based on the ZRE decision, has been billed to citizens of other parts on behalf of the return of other costs of losses to the transmission system, without right and legal basis).

Therefore, claims about reasoning and not indicating in the four northern municipalities with security reasons are not sustainable, and do not have access to knowledge reading in that section, because it is not justified that other citizens for these reasons be charged with paying for spent electricity without a legal basis. Therefore, with this fate and payment has become the unfair treatment of Kosovo citizens, which conflicts with Article 55 per cent. 4, of the Constitution, inequitable treatment cited as in the courts of lower institutions, because it has become a restriction on human rights. So based on the 194th article of LMD, consumers, who without legal basis and without their knowledge are billed and paid for the energy spent in the north, were granted the right to return the paid amount to how the courts of the lowest intensities have established”.