Naser Pajazaj's lawyer: The prosecution is the problem, in Strellc on the Low were five cars the same.

Ahmet Tahiri, Naser Pajasitaj's lawyer, spoke on the T7 FRONTAL show after the Supreme Court acquitted his client of charges of the death of Donjeta Pajasitaj. Tahiri has said he understands Donjeta Pajaziaj's family, but says it is his duty to protect his client. According to Tahiri, Court [...]
Tahiri has said he understands Donjeta Pajaziaj's family, but says it is his duty to protect his client. According to Tahiri, the Supreme Court has confirmed today that Naser Pajazitaj has been held in prison for seven years without any evidence.
I can see that she lost her sister. But our job is to protect our client. This Supreme decision confirmed that Naser Pajazitaj has been held in prison for seven years without any evidence of”, he said in Frontal.
According to the lawyer, the report from the scene and the cameras Donkat Pajazitaj's brother speaks of proved that Donjeta Pajazitaj was not in Naser Pajazitaj's car.
He says the images have been sent for expertise in Ankara and, according to him, have proved that cameras could not be described for so few seconds. The lawyer says that for as long as the video shows, Naser Pajasitaj would have to be driving 250 miles per hour.
The report at the scene and the cameras referring to The Rift and it's not true that Donjet was in Naser's car. According to the expertise report, we have proven that the video route could be described for as few seconds. The expert has been sent to Ankara. According to expertise he would have to drive 250km per hour”, the lawyer at FRONTTAL said.
He has since shown that there have been five of the same cars as Naser Pajazitaj and adds that in the other village of Strellc, 15 have been the same.
Lawyer Tahiri says the problem in this case is that the prosecution is based only on one runway.
There were five of the same cars in Low Stream alone. Another 15 in Strellz. That's the problem that the prosecution has only started on a derelict”, has added to the lawyer.
Asked to reason for his release, Tahiri has said that the S'e have yet to be officially received, but adds that the scheme is as different as being released in absence of evidence.
There's still a reason we've received the argument, but without evidence it's released. There may be other reasons.
Justice works with facts, not guesswork.
Take any experts you want and let's just find one test, there's no evidence”, the lawyer said.
He then, questioned about the verdicts of preliminary courts that had been found guilty Naser Pajazitain, has said Nasser has been made public court and justice must be affected.
“Naser has been made public trial. Justice wasn't supposed to be needed. The only court that has been correct has been the Supreme Court, which has deemed the evidence correct. If a girl is dead, does that mean that a person becomes a sacrifice in absence of evidence? Naser Pajitaj's entire family is lynchu, the entire village has lynchu. Evidence has been sent to Ankara, and the FBI. They're all back in behalf of Naser”, the lawyer's position.
Asked whether he met Nasser after the verdict, the lawyer said he saw it briefly and wished him for release.
I wasn't with Naser. But based on evidence and witnesses, it turns out that Naser did not do this work. The failure has been by the Prosecutor's side that has investigated only one root of the investigation. At least we're not informed if he investigated. I just met him briefly. I wished him for release. I'm sorry he's been in prison for seven years unjustly”, the lawyer's finished.












