3 minutes agoKrasniqi's defence: NATO would not back a criminal enterprise
Periskopi(3 years ago)
(3 years ago)Venkateswari Alagedra, Jakup Krasniqi's defence lawyer, said the fact that the prosecution insists that a joint criminal enterprise has been held in the KLA, and the claim of common criminal intent “was known and public” does not last. “This means that NATO supported a known criminal enterprise”, she said, referring to the bombing of [...]
“This means that NATO supported a prominent criminal enterprise”, she said, referring to NATO bombings that led to the end of the war in Kosovo.
She said the SPS has no reliable <x0-tests linking Krasniqi to no crime, there is no evidence for joint criminal purposes”.
In the continuation of Jakup Krasniqi's opening speech, lawyer Venkateswari Alagedra said the prosecution has misinterpreted Krasniqi's role in the KLA and the entire organisation of this army.
It has not been in a hierarchical relationship with the physical perpetrators. He didn't have the ability to effectively control any soldiers”, Alagedra said.
According to her, the prosecution has failed to link alleged crimes to Krasniqi's physical whereabouts through different time periods during 1999.
Alagedra stated that “The prosecutor seems to have become part of the propaganda against KLA”
“Proves will show that organisation The KLA was different in different places and times”, she said, and added that the KLA never had a vertical command hierarchy.
