According to experts, elections were legal and have legitimacy

Artan Mustafa, the Legissary of Social Policy, said Kosovo has made good choices, but these of today have had a different nature, have been extraordinary and challenged by the Serb community.

“The elections have not been important elections in terms of governance, but a contest of a Kosovo and Serbia's race of sovereignty. Serbia has proved to have real control there”, he said.

Mustafa, however, said Kosovo cannot escape association, as this is a process that has started since 2004.

However, he said that in this election, not only has the threat and fears that have not emerged in the elections dominated, but there is also a resistance of Serbs and Serbia against Kosovo institutions. “Avoidances of violence have affected and the response of international diplomats”, Mustafa said, among other things.

While International Law professor Flamur Hyseni said the election process has been orderly, while the good, according to him, is that Serbia failed to decide on order and law in the north.

The “government has been committed and elections are legal and what is legal is also legitimate. If we go in hypothetical terms that they (Serbs) are majority, this does not represent a survey. Serbs have to listen to Belgrade, but Pristina and come to the elections”, Hyseni said.

According to him, there is a kind of awareness because there has been no incident in the election. The so-called “and Serbia have failed to influence the process”, he said.

While analyst and security expert Nuredin Ibishi said pressure on Serbs in the north has been great and continuous by Belgrade. He mentioned burning cars and even Jablanovac's resignation.

“These elections were quiet, while in terms of legitimacy it is to wish, but this process has been successfully completed”, said Ibishi, who said it was originally about delaying the elections.

“ ... but the good is that the process has done well and the state bodies have done its job, including Kosovo police”, he said.