Tahiri: Salvation for Association Is Constitutional Court Decision

However, he says their stance strengthened the fact that Albin Kurti “weakened Kosovo with his acronyms”.

The AAK's “position in support of reaching agreement is not yesterday, we've been consistent for a year. Lately from August of last year, we are the only party that has dated citizens and we have talked about two topics: the need to reach the Kosovo-Serbia agreement and social issues. Our attitude has been consistent. Our position has been forced by the fact that Albin Kurti greatly weakened Kosovo with his acrobaties and experiments where what happened happened that we all oppose, the pouring out of Kosovo institutions by local Serbs occurred. The deputies, mayors, judges, resigned, and a new reality was created. This new reality is asked, did Albin Kurti make it with the intention of justifying the agreement or not knowing”.

I think there's only one direction here. Where America is, you don't have what you treat”, Tahir said on the subject of the debate.

Tahiri has said Article 7 is problematic, but according to him, salvation for association is the decision of the “Constitutional Court.

“Pica 7 is problematic. It has ambition, but he should not be seen by us as a great danger, he is a real possibility for Vucinate, and they never told me that I accept Kosovo and that I accepted. Our salvation for Association is the Constitutional Court's decision, because the statute goes to that line of”, Tahiri said.

And the point of the implementation of all agreements, Tahiri says it is another problem, since the 2015 agreement is unconstitutional.

The most problematic “Picka is Article 10, because it says implementation of all agreements. The implementation of the 2013 agreement, then that in 2013, which is up to that of 2013, is unconstitutional”, Tahiri has declared at the debate angle in Tv 1.