In the retrial, chief of FFK, Agim Ademi and Muharrem Rama are acquitted of obligation

Ademi and Rama were charged that in 2012 they had threatened and attacked the injured Dritall, urging him to provide 30,000 euros or a “BMW X5”, reports “Justice Trust”.

The indictment against the two indictees was announced Wednesday by the judge of the case, Sabit Sadij.

According to the indictment, it has not been proven that the two defendants committed the criminal offense they were placed under.

The indictment was pronounced in the absence of indictees Ademi and Rama, as was prosecutor Elza Bajrami.

Procedual spending falls to the court's burden, while the damaged side has the right to implement property-juridic demand within the legal deadline.

Within 30 days of accepting written-shaped bias, the parties have the right to file a complaint with the Court of Appeals.

The accused Ademi and Rama, on November 7th, 2022, at the retrial hearing, had pleaded innocent over the charge they were charged with.

Because the criminal act of influence, for which a refusal act was pronounced in July 2019, the subject has been passed to the General Department of the Constitutional Court in Pristina.

This subject, originally when it was returned to the retrial, has been tried in the Department of Criminal Crimes by Judge Medie Bytyqi, the latter for the “Justice Vow” and had also confirmed that this subject has already passed the General Department.

Otherwise, the indictment against Rama and Adam was established on January 14, 2014, by the prosecutor EULEX, Maarten Groothuisen and Pristina Foundation Prosecutor's Prosecutor, Ilaz Beqiri.

According to the first point of the indictment, Ademi and Rama were charged that during July 12th, September 12, 2012, with the aim of material gain, they had threatened and attacked the victim, Dritro Kadolli, forcing the same to commit actions at the expense of his property, respectively, to make an unfair profit in the amount of 30,000 euros, or a car called “BMW X5”

This vehicle, according to the prosecution, was then claimed to be handed over to Sami Hamit, former head of the Pristina Municipal Assembly, performing the criminal offence in co-ordination.

Meanwhile, at the second point of the indictment, Adam and Rama were accused of exercising influence in co-ordination.

According to the indictment, the two indictees had demanded from the injured Kadolli the promise of unjust profit -- the amount of 30,000 euros, or type car “, respectively. BMW X5”, looking for the exercise of their improper influence in decision making an official person who in this case was the former head of the Municipal Assembly in Pristina, Sami Hamiti, to change the status of a plot of land from the green “to the “construction area”.

The Constitutional Court in Pristina, on July 5, 2019, had convicted Ademi and Rama of the attempted criminal offence.

Ademi was sentenced by the first rate to nine months in effective prison, while Rama was sentenced to an effective year in prison.

In these sentences, the accused had been decided to be even counted as the time spent in detention from 12 September to 2 November 2012. For the criminal work of exercising influence, however, there had been a declaration of rejection because of the prescribing of this work.

By February 2020, the Court of Appeals had rejected the accused's complaints and had passed the sentences imposed by the first degree.

Disgusted with such judgments, however, the defenders of the accused had turned to him on request for protection of the Supreme Court's legality.

In terms of this requirement, the Supreme Court in July 2020 has decided to approve the same as based, and the subject has turned it into retrial to the first degree.

The Supreme Court's “Colegy, placing in terms of a demand for protection of the legality of M.R. convicted defender. Lawyer R.K., and convicted A.A., filed against the formal form of the Court in Pristina, the Department of Criminals, PKR.n.51/2014 of July 5, 2019, at the college session held on July 15, 2020, approved these two requests as based, while the Constitutional Court Act in Pristina quite frankly, PKR.n.51/2014 of July 5, 2019 and Kosovo Court of Appeals PARKR.r.504/2019 of February 12, 2020, cancelled the case, and returned the case to the first-instance court, to the retrial”, the Supreme Court's announcement said. /Betimy for Justice