7 minutes agoMaliqi says impasse stems from dispute over (not) signing the document
Periskopi(3 years ago)
(3 years ago)Analyst Agon Maliqi has said in a Twitter post that the impasse at the Ohrid meeting relates to signing the document. According to him, the Kosovar side is demanding that it have the signature of both sides, while the Serbian side requires that the document be signed, but as an EU document. Maliqi estimates that if not [...]
Maliqi estimates that if there's no signature, then it can't be called a deal. Meanwhile, the parties have agreed to the contents of the agreement, but have failed to find an agreement to sign the document.
Keeping in Ohrid reportedly has to do with signatures. The parties agree on the content of the agreement, but Kosovo wants it signed by both sides. Serbia prefers to stand as an EU document, which it would use to keep the parties responsible. How could it be called a deal if it wasn't signed?
