Kica-Jali: Minister Haxhiu respect democracy, or move to an autocratic state

LDK MP Doarsa Kica-Jeli has reacted to Minister Albulen Haxhiu, who has said one should show he is the minister in a democratic state, where powers are divided and cannot control the judiciary. Through a Facebook post, she said someone should remind this minister that [...]
Through a Facebook post, she has said that someone should remind this minister that she is the minister of justice rather than the lynching campaign.
She added that this should not speak and act as it is.
In the end, the MP has said that all this memory of this will be in vain, as she has tried this privately and publicly many times but that she has personally received.
Her full mail:
Someone should remind this minister that he is minister in a DEMOCRAIC state where powers are divided and I cannot control the judiciary (luckily for democracy).
Someone has to remind this minister that he is the minister of the DREJICE and not the continuing minister of the campaign. That the rule of law she makes into a personal last name in the campaign should be overnamed when running the institution.
Someone has to remind this minister that she is not. IT IS up to me to comment on the content of judicial decisions, and much less to the Constitutional Court when it undermines SAH's decisions. Neither this Court nor this democracy have been created thanks to Minister Haxhiu, in fact, according to the thought this majority is spreading.
But, she is the minister of this parliamentary democracy and must OSE respect this democracy, or move to an autocratic state that corresponds to its ideology.
And when you remind him of all of this, remind him that it is the reco-ordination of the Council of Europe that this minister is not. GUXON Speaks and acts.
Paragraph 18 of Council of Europe recommendations for judicial independence [ CM/Rec 2010)12:
“If judges' decisions, executive and legislative powers are commented on should avoid criticisms that would undermine the independence or public confidence in the judiciary (...) in addition to declaring their intention to appeal/ancuse. ”
At the end of the day, I remind you and perhaps a little myself, that this whole story will be potentially useless.
I tried. I told him everything. Privately public. Every time I called on these recommendations, these standards, these democratic pillars, she made it personal. She or those who serve her. That's all I expect from her. That's all I expect from them.












