The Court of Appeals turns Agnis Tetaj assassination into retrial

The suspect in Tetaj's murder, Shaban Gogaj, was sentenced to seven years and six months in prison.

This was after the case had been described as a careless murder.

“With the Act of Foundation Court in Payful Crime Department, PKR.r.43/2019 of the date 14,12.2022, accused U.S.G. It has been convicted because of criminal offence killings by the KKP's Article 181 and criminally possession of property, control or authorised weapons by Article 374 paragraph 1 of the KKP, while accused I.C. It has been convicted because of the criminal offence of possession, control, or authorised possession of weapons, by Article 374 paragraph 1 of KKP, so that accused U.S.G. has been tried with a unique sentence of 7 (seven) years and 6 months, in which the sentence has been counted the time spent in detention, while indictees I.C. have been pronounced fined in many of 2000 (two thousand euros), in which sentence has been imposed on me to pay in 15 days, following the indomitability of the act”, is said to be in the municipality of the Court of Appeals.

Appeal has also listed reasons.

“The Court of Appeals with the PACE Constitution.N.1032023, on 2303.23, has approved the Constitutional Prosecutor's complaint in Gjilan-Department for the Criminals, and on official duty has annulled the court's first court bias and the case has been returned to the same court in retrial and re-restitution. In reasoning of the second-instance court's ruling, the court's act of first-instance is included in violations which cannot be an integral part of the criminal case, and the same court's act of first-instance judgment, make it unintelligible, and it is true that judicial examination has been held on this case, and the court of first degree has not properly assessed all the evidence that characterizes the criminal case. The goal is to note that the first degree court has failed to assess the existence of a criminal offense for which it has convicted the accused, and it turns out that, in due measure, not all evidence that is part of this criminal offense to find the completion of re-qualification of criminal acts by the criminal act of serious murder, by Article 179 par.1 points of the KKP, in the criminal offence of murder by the 181 KKP, and the motive of the criminal work. While in the case of detention, the same has been reviewed, but this court's college has come to the conclusion that the same must be extended, because legal conditions still exist, for the accused U.S.A. to remain in custody”, the decision said.