Mollyqa: The government's notion of monotheism was launched to appear to have improved the Acciation statute

Social Democratic Party Chairman Dardan Moliqaj has written that the notion of monothenicity has been launched by the government, in his opinion, that the statute of association is improving. Moliqaj says it won't be monoethnic association in the end. He said in a Facebook script that association is harmful “in each version” and [...]
On a Facebook note, he said that association is harmful “in each version” and unacceptable.
This notion of monotheism was launched by the government to appear to have improved the Association statute, of the final version, you know, it wouldn't have been MONO. Never had a dog. Even when he was opposed to protests and actions within the Parliament. Association is now harmful in each version. And as such absolutely unacceptable”, he wrote.
Full Posting:
For an association, let's get together!
This notion of monotentity was launched by the government to appear to have improved the Association statute, of the final version, you know, it wouldn't have been MONO. Never had a dog. Even when he was opposed to protests and actions within the Parliament. Association is now harmful in each version. And as such, absolutely unacceptable.
The strategy is this: invent the problem, fight it and proclaim success. All this is a figment of the imagination. The government has major war with its supporters. It is his duty to answer the difficult question - how it feels principled and fair without being one. This exceeds the topic of association. It's their political being.
They create insulin and when they are not happening (that they are innovations, mainly by misusing human situations) then they share with us the news of success, how they stop, improve, or stop. All three statements are lies.
So organizing for a more equal society has to overcome the conflict over association. Even those who oppose and those who are for them have powerful reason to unite. We must be organized against all of us who do not stand to rule with dogmatic, authoritarian political models.












