Mehmetaj for Cali's sentence to 22 years in prison: The Court has proved there is no evidence

Journalist Lirim Mehmetaj, on the Debat Plus show, has issued the main points of the Special Court's decision to sentence former KLA soldier Sali Mustafa dealt with 22 years in prison. Below, Periscopi brings this part of journalist Mehmetaj: It is confirm my decision to keep one person in prison 22 years for a murder that [...]
Journalist Lirim Mehmetaj, on the Debat Plus show, has issued the main points of the Special Court's decision to sentence former KLA soldier Sali Mustafa dealt with 22 years in prison.
Below, Periscope brings this part of journalist Mehmetaj:
It's a confirmation of the decision to keep a man in prison 22 years for an unknown murder, no location or time.
The decision is about 350 pages, and not all of them have access to and read, they know exactly what the general charges are.
Now, that's it. Initially, Sali Mustafa is convicted of some arbitrary bans, mistreatment, but the main charge has been of killing a person.
Now see what the court's decision says.
He says: The court notices that the evidence is different What about the day you found him dead?
The Court acknowledges that there is no evidence but that it is based on witness testimony and then the court's logical preconceptions about how it could be.
The Court acknowledges that there is no evidence in the form of an autopsy concerning the cause and manner of death of the vikim, illegal murder is called them.
Now, they're asking the witnesses where they found the bullets, because they've had some bullets to kill.
One witness says, on the right side of the victim's stomach. The other says: the back of the head. The other says: one hole on the left side of the victim and I didn't notice another mark. Noan says two bullets, the other three or four, one says in the belly, the other in the head. The other says: the body was in disarray and we couldn't have been able to get all those holes and the other witness says that we had no examination.
The justice body estimates that the evidence creates grounds, though not conclusively that Serbian forces promoted and fired the detention complex in Zlath.
So, this is where suspicions are raised by the court itself that could have been killed by Serb forces and not by the KLA.
Remember, Mr. Sali Mustafa never connects with direct murder. He's too much for not preventing one person's murder.
Now, when did he die? Court is unable to determine when the victim of the illegal murder died.
There is reasonable doubt that the bullet holes found in the victim's body could be attributed to BIA members of this KLA unit or Serbian troops.
The court judges that this suspicion is not imaginary, it has rational links to evidence that Serbian forces shot at the 2003 detention complex.
And it says, however, that even if gun shooting was attributed only to Serbian forces, the court judges that that would not relieve the accused of responsibility.
So even if there was evidence that there's more evidence that it was killed by Serbs in the offensive to the complex, even if Serbs killed him, the responsibility goes to Cal because he was responsible for not keeping me there.
But the evidence that has kept him there is not because the body is not there. It says the body is found in a field between the mountains. That doesn't make sense as a sentence, nor does it make sense.
And he says he's responsible for not offering medical assistance to those who are in there, but it's no indication that he had the capacity to provide medical help, nor is there any evidence that the victim needed medical assistance.
The victim is unknown, not named, so referred to as illegal suicide.
When the prosecutor wanted to prove the witnesses' testimony, and he wanted to know for days if they knew exactly where they were, they took a picture of them and asked if it was this place, they said yes.
So one person has been sentenced to 22 years, because some witnesses despite having no evidence make them guilty of either direct murder or immediate murder or murder that the NLA has done, but for holding a person in a centre that has no evidence that has been at that center”, Mehmetaj relates./Periscopi












