Kosovo lawyer: There are methods to detect the murder of Liridona Ademij

Sopjan has pointed out that although the motive is very complex, the case should be left to organs and there are ways to reveal the motive.

He claims there are crimes that are very close to perfection, but in the case of Liridona Ademiaj, Sopijan says the authors have been very amateurs.

There is no perfect crime, but there are crimes that are very close to perfection. The criminal is always a step ahead of the police, and that's what's known to him, because he's the one who makes the plan. Part of the investigation is seen as completed, but it is very important to reveal the motive because the motive for the work is very important. The motive in this case is complex because the discovery of motive in a criminal case determines whether we are dealing with serious murder and determines the involvement of others in criminal acts, other criminal acts that are related to this criminal offense. There's a lot of speculation about motive. It must be left to the organs and there are ways to detect the motive. The motive is left with the testator, because the powerman's motive has been detected, the financial one. It is also the psychological approach of the person in question, the gathering of information from those who know him. Liridona's brother should offer investigators the names they contacted”, he said, on the “Five” show, at RTV Dukajini.

Despite the complexity of the case, attorney Sopjan estimates that the investigation to this stage has gone extremely well, considering the rapid outcome achieved in identifying responsible persons, despite the fact, as Sopijan says, that they are still considered innocent until the court's final ruling.

He emphasises that the investigation has begun with receiving footage from cameras that have owned private homes.

The “Police investigators have been successful in basing doubt on the involvement of persons in this case. The investigation started with cameras, but not cameras that were set up, after the event took place at the scene, because it doesn't happen that in such cases it doesn't happen to bring the perpetrators back to the scene after the event happens, very rarely does the return, because their goal is to stay as far away as possible and as quickly as possible from the incident and any tissue that can be created that connects them to that”.

It's true that some of the houses around them had cameras, the vehicle could have identified and the presence of people at the scene before the event happened and cameras were broadcast. According to the vehicle, the person who was the handbill was identified. Cameras were taken to Gjakova when they were watched how far this vehicle moved. Security cameras were also taken to the restaurant, where the device was present that night. Doras was identified, but the testator was unaware, and he was betrayed by the handkeeper who told ... The event has been amateurly prepared”, he added.

He adds that Naim Mursel, who allegedly is the testator of his wife's murder Liridona, although reportedly has admitted his involvement in the case, however, according to Sopjan, he can deny that admission.

Police investigators have had a different investigation track from the beginning and the lead of the husband's involvement has not been disfellowshipped, but during the operation the manual has shown itself. The orderator first made an admission before the police bodies, legally he may find reason to deny that admission. The investigation has continued... Finally came the gun dealer”. /Dukagini/