Hajdari does not answer whether he has received a day off from court today

Roseta Hajdari, Minister of Industry, Intervention and Trade (MINT) on Wednesday, has taken part in the trial, where she is accused of causing traffic accidents, with the cases hurting a minor. And as she went to the courtroom, “Justice Vow” asked her if she got fired today when the same [...]
And as she went to the courtroom, “Justice Vow” asked her if she got laid off today, when the same was presented at the hearing, but Minister Hajdari did not respond.
She was also asked who was the person she was accompanying and if the same was her assistant, but she still didn't answer.
At the October 12th 2022 session, Minister Hajdari had said he was not guilty of the accident where a child was hit, according to her, she had been at speed within the communications rules and that suddenly the girl was hit by the car because the same girl was running.
We remember that the request to defendant Hajdari for the initiative of the counter-invention procedure was made by the Kosovo police station, the Kosovo Police Regional Road Communications Unit, for the accident that took place on 10 April 2022, around 12:25 on the “Vicianum” street in Pristina.
At the same request, Hajdari was tasked with “Speed non-recognition” and “Accur communication with body injury”.
Meanwhile, for “Justice Trust”, the representative of the damaged party, lawyer Florim Shefqeti, had said they appreciated that the communications expert would determine the position of the defendant, which, according to the video, was seen as being on the left side, while its direction of the movement was the right arm.
He said the prosecution had to first define the speed of moving ahead of the case's instructions on counter-insulting.
And also, from the subject paperwork has been the rainfall route and from the speed of movement seen in the video, we expect what was normally required to make the prosecution determine the speed of moving and adapting the speed of movement and weather conditions on the road, and this will define whether we have to do more against it or are dealing with criminal work. Similarly, we think that the prosecutor of the case had to clear up this situation before he could point out the case for the Anti-Avention Department”, said attorney Shefqeti.












