VV's divisions continue: Member taken out of the Prizren Branch Leaderial Race due to stance on Civil Code

Kizolli in his account on éfacebook has shown the entire chronology of the event, and has also discovered the call he received from Pristina to ask him about his position on the Civil Code.

“1. I'm “pro” Civil Codes

2. I'm “Against” Article for the community in question, because there was no explanation for the Movement's final position on the matter. At this point, especially on the issue of adoption that tomorrow will be regulated by law, which will have support in this KOD, I am a KUN. Yes, I have status and I have supported page “Family”. If I had moved to Parliament, I had not intended to distance myself from the Movement, but also the treatment of the Movement for my stand on the Civil Code and the distance from me, I do not appreciate it as sound. “, Kizolli wrote.

He says that after this response, it has been reportedly eliminated from the race for chairman of the Vetevendosje branch in Prizren.

Kizolli at the end of his response has also addressed criticism of the loss of the Vetevendosje Movement in recent local elections, holding the central leadership in Pristina responsible for all that has happened.

Full response:

Dear friends,

After my run for V Movement Speaker EVIDENCE! The centre in Prizren, like any other candidate, needed the process of two filters, KZP's assessment in Pristina and 1/3 signatures of the Workers Group in Prizren, or 10% of membership signatures, if it could not ensure .1/3 of the working Group signatures.

Waiting for the answer to the first phase, I sought and was informed that all the signatures of the working Group members in Prizren, comprised of 14 members, besides signing Mr. Mythaher Haskuka and Mrs. Mimoza Bushrani, was “blocked” by counterCandidadati, knowing that only 5 signatures were enough for a candidate. There were possibilities for equal and democratic competition. But it didn't.

On Monday, I received a phone call from a KZP official who informed me of the courses and asked me for clarification of my stand on the Civil Code, the article about the community in question, and that was my answer, regarding the part of the Civil Code:

“1. I'm “pro” Civil Codes

2. I'm “Against” Article for the community in question, because there was no explanation for the Movement's final position on the matter. At this point, especially on the issue of adoption that tomorrow will be regulated by law, which will have support in this KOD, I am a KUN. Yes, I have status and I have supported page “Family”. If I had moved to Parliament, I had not intended to distance myself from the Movement, but also the treatment of the Movement for my stand on the Civil Code and the distance from me, I do not appreciate it as sound. “

Today, I was informed that I was eliminated from the race, and I consider this decision arbitrary and a violation of the statute, which requires and allows a spirit of democracy, in which each member has the right to choose and select according to principle, ” a member of a” vote. With my elimination, democracy is being degraded within the Movement, transforming the race into a single candidate, with the principle “a candidate vote”. Then, with no clear description, reasoning about my elimination is damaging my integrity and dignity.

Success achieved on February 14th requires political and professional responsibility. The elimination is a clear indication of ignoring citizens' support and the commitment of every citizen. It's contraction, isolation and marginalization.

Whatever time and circumstances required, I humbly and modestly responded and accepted the task of commitment. Now, they showed me the door or the place and time will testify.

At this time of crisis, where the country needs political stability, this harsh spirit, with these links and eliminations, is destroying society's hope.

I feel no responsibility, but I'm hurt! Every contribution of any effort I've given them is lawful because I've done it for my country and my society. All over, never and never at any time have I knocked on the front door of the Movement to ask for something, but I always knocked on the door of the Movement, to give up everything, but not even the dignity of my personal integrity.

P.S. Why did I run?

The local elections were lost as a result of the central-level neglect approach, where the candidate candidacy for four years led Prizren's municipality was formalised on the last day. Coordination in the campaign did not even resemble the biggest subject in the country, so we did not lose the municipality but handed it over. The current opposition, is going on with the discurs that we haven't experienced, with phrases: <x0 we congratulate”, “we have expectations” and along with the reference disks to the current power in Prizren, even supporting “vota on the committee”. Organising and opposition give me no hope in restoring, in local governance, nor in preserving votes in central elections. Race within the Movement was opportunity, need, and need to develop the organization. Without accounting for losing local elections, destroying the domestic election process, desecrating domestic democracy, you are assessing membership and risking too much for the upcoming national and local elections.

I warmly thank the overwhelming part of the Movement's membership in Prizren, because you welcomed my candidacy and offered my support without saving, non-stop commitment, and I am eternally indebted to not hurting you. Because, above all “You are Vetevendosje! ”