Iron Murat's official violates the law a little bit: I'm done like that.

After a company for the construction of the elevator was declared a winner, the Finance Ministry, which is led by Iron Murati, has not allowed the documentation of the winning company's offer to be given to a competitive -ancture company.

Thus, the ministry, except that it violated the Procurement Law, has raised doubts that it could select a company that failed to meet the conditions.

“Rule of the cage, rampas, supply and installation of the elevator at the home of senior persons in Pristina”. So it's called the procurement process that the MF is claiming to finalise with a contract.

After the competitive process opened in June, only three companies entered the race:

At 44, 999.90 euros.

“uppher”, at 39, 947, 00 euros.

“Eona”, at 45, 454. A hundred euros.

Ministry procurement selected winner “UrbanLift”, since the main criterion was the cheapest price, and according to them, they met the other requirements.

Having suspected that the winner was not complete with documentation, on August 15th, the company “Eona” has filed complaints against the ministry's decision, where it sought access to the company's bid under the legal deadline. But, the ministry's H.D. procurement official has refused to give you a copy of the material, or to convey it electronically, but has invited them to go to the ministry and watch it, without taking anything on their own.

In this regard, the complaining company has complained to the Public Procureing Organization -O And this organ authorized his expert to review the evidence. The expert has found that the ministry has violated the law and recommended to the panel of this body since it meets to approve the complaint company's complaint.

But what about this report Periscope saw?

The complaining company, as seen in the report, has said they have exchanged 14 emails with interpretations of the law, but the ministry's official has refused to provide a copy of the winning company's bid documentation.

You can't get these documents you take home because they're foreign documents. These guys have fulfilled all the criteria that we've checked our own documents, if you want to come check on our office, no more”

The complainer went on to write that we've been trying to clear the lady that it's our right to get full documentation because no company has ever filed a secret businessman statement. The ministry official forced us to go to her office for access to documentation for the second time, and had printed the paperwork with more than 200 pages and left it on the table. When I asked to take the documentation myself because it was impossible to evaluate, he told us that there is no logic to take the foreign documentation with the public on Facebook”.

On the other hand, the complainer wrote that he later went to the Public Procureing Commission. - KRPP, where she called the ministry official on the phone and spoke to me about the CRPP officer “please respect the Public Procurement Law and don't hesitate to ensure access to the economic operator, since you're committing a violation of”.

On the phone, according to the complainers, the ministry official at one point told me: “You might be right, but I'm just saying this, when you get something hard to change my mind”

Article 10 of the Public Procure Law. Point 5 says that “Autority contractor, at the request of an interested party, will make and will provide such an interested side with a copy of any material in which such interested side has access to paragraph 3 of this Article”. Paragraph 3 says” At written request from any side of the interest, the contracting authority provides reasonable access to the data described in paragraph 1 and 2 of this article, in addition to the business procurement information that is closed”.

At the end of the report, the researcher, Ilir Halili, who submitted the expertise report on September 2, 2022, has confirmed the complainer's claims not to allow a copy of the required documentation. The expert has suggested that this procurement subject should be turned into review by the ministry and allow access to the complaining company documentation.

This procurement subject has been suspended by the ministry, as the complaint has been made in O The screen, and it will be unblocked only after I make O panel decision The E.P. /Periscopi/