Eman Nundman tells of Periscopi why they sat down with Agushol in the opposition in the Parliament

Eman Candman in a statement to Periscopi explained that moving them to other seats was random.

We're sitting down during the pause when we're back, so don't bother other colleagues. There's been a vote there and every session sits down anyone who can. It's not like we changed our seats. I saw the portals you've distributed, there's nothing I can do but it's closer to the door. It is the constant practice of all MPs. It's where they sit from all parties. C'mon, explain to the Candor for Periscope.

We remember that Candorman is one of Vetevendosje's deputies coming up against the party in many processes. It's recently the strike, which has thrown criticism of Kurti Government. \

Here's the top five statements of Candor that are spreading even the VVU's internal debate about the Civil Code and other party organisational issues:

1.The process has been with some shortcomings for me, but the result is that it's out. It is also reasonable to have a chairman of Vetevendosje and Prime Minister Albin Kurti.

2.I've been a member of the headship of downtown Pristina, as long as I have enough of my contribution from the Assembly. I gave my commitment to the downtown of Pristina with what I could give. I saw that I don't have much more of what they gave me.

3. I personally have my remarks regarding the level of organization and the lack of some tolerance towards those who have decided to be candidates. You see some of the candidates that were, I don't think there's been any reason to be away from the race. It was the head of Vetevendosje that gives or refuses to run. Now there's discussions that are inside Vetevendosje.

4.Without a Disciplinary Commission decision, I think it's bad to stop a candidate with a candido, except for a fact that he was opposed to the organization. I believe this will be one of the shortcomings that will convey Vetevendosje to the local level.

5.You're asking for the future that supports me, I can't talk about this case, I don't know, but it's not the standard that's followed by anyone who didn't vote on the Civil Code can't be elected head of the center. Did we have an inner dispute?For Civil Code, our explanationWe had a huge amount of money. But there were also public debates on what we said in the House. Have the reports changed inside, but there are deputies who have changed reports since the Civil Code was in the Assembly. We asked for two articles and not to be held hostage by the Civil Code that we said they won't find our support. Based on the information that I have when this law in the Ministry of Justice was launched, it wasn't these two articles, but it was brought by the prime minister's advisers during the government's processing and came to the Assembly with those two articles, but it's known that the Hill will soon come to the Assembly, but my answer to those two articles will be the same./ P ERISCOPI/