Pristina deputy chairman, says the 750,000-euro “Pristina Parking” contract must be cancelled

“Parking management services for NPL Pristina Parking sh.a”. So it's called the contract this public company tied to company “a few days ago. INT Class Marketing” S.P.K. There have been numerous reactions to this contract, a text where possible favour to a company was highlighted just a few days ago, even Periscope.

clockchi said he'd see the contract in detail the other day. The vice president has written today that contract appears to be annulled because, as she has said, he leaves many doubts about possible favourability and violation of the law during her negotiations.

Complete Donjathatciu Posting

NPL Pristina Parking contract 750,000 euros must be annulled

With the acceptance of full documentation of the process for announcing the winning economic operator for the <x0-> contract. Software service for public parking management in the Pristina municipality. ” delete many questions.

Is there a basis and need for accelerated procedure? No.

Is there a basis for negotiated procedure? No. Although The NPL is called on in the fact that the winning economic operator is the same operator who has built past applications, there is the basis of alleged willful release by not demanding ownership of the intellectual code/ownership in handing over the app when it was built.

Is there a basis for the value of the contract? No. The required work volume could become no more than 3,000 hours of work. The price of the clock cannot be 250 euros, even if we remove infrastructure costs. Come on, the contract doesn't turn into a working hour at all as a measure. The signing of the contract as hisedare with 15% of the circulation value and the lack of ownership at the company, among other things, is the indicator of future service contracting with the same operator, with the same procedure.

Is there a basis of doubt in the credentials of the winning economic operator? Yeah. While online is presented as a communications provider on social networks, there is no online credentials that testify to the referenced professional experience in performing required services.

Is there just a basis of doubt with two identical mobile apps of NPL Pristina Parking built by the same operator? Yeah. Citizens daily report doubts about taking money into two parallel systems.

Is this contract good for parking service in these conditions in Pristina? No, not at all. Add here the current situation on the ground with hundreds of citizens' complaints about poor service.

This contract must be canceled, placed in responsibility, and prevented from continuing misuse. /Periscopi/

Periscop reporting:

750 thousand euros for one software: The suspicious contract by Pristina Parking '%s' for the company allegedly blowing the prize