The prosecution calls for a legal act against the accused for killing his wife and stabbed his wife and daughter

Gunter Villa is also being charged with criminal work “HeavyPlasosus”, for stabning the wife's wife in Germany, reports the “Justice Vow”.

Prosecutor Rasim Maloku in the final address said this case was special, since the event took place in Germany, where some of the evidence for this procedure was provided and finally confirmed as the indictment describes criminal acts.

This case took place in 2002, due to the defendant's escape, this issue has remained unjudiced until the arrest and extradition to Kosovo in 2011. Initially, the Charles Prosecution had this case, while in 2013 this case was passed to the Constitutional Prosecutor at Ferizaj, so in 2019 it was arrested in the state of Italy, and a year after 2020 it was extradited to Kosovo”, prosecutor Maloku has declared.

The same court has proposed to the accused that he declare a merit act with which the responsibility of the criminal act would be achieved.

The defender of the victims, Ibrahim Trstena, said he supports the prosecutor's word, which also proposes that the accused be convicted and condemned by law.

Otherwise, indictee Afet Gunter Villa's defender, lawyer Avni Ibrahimi, said the defence claims it does not result in a desire for criminal acts on the part of the accused.

“From administered evidence does not prove that the murder was deliberately committed, the judge suggested that the accused declare a milder sentence because harsh punishment would be unreasonable”, said lawyer Ibrahimi.

After that, Judge Goga-Lubishan found that the case was well considered, so she concluded the case.

Statement of the case was scheduled on July 14, 2022.

Otherwise, according to the indictment, on November 9, 2002, in the waiting room of the common family residence on the “Dietrichstrase”, No.4 at Bad Oeynhase, the Republic of Germany, Afet Gunter Vila had deliberately deprived his wife of life I.G., following the ongoing disagreements she now felt during the year period that they had lived together in the apartment.

The charge is said to be because of the jealousy the defendant felt toward his wife, who he suspected was cheating on others on the critical day of the defendant had tried to telephone him several times, but his wife had not been notified after forgetting the phone at the residence until with her friend D. They had gone to rent some CDs with films.

On the other hand, according to the device I of the indictment, upon returning to the defendant's residence with her friend, where she was standing and her daughter H., the defendant initially asks her wife for why she did not answer the phone, constantly raising her voice while I. She had tried to convince him that she had forgotten her phone at the apartment.

Always according to the charge, the defendant was then exasperated and more by turning down a table, then I. He threatened it with the words “You're going to die” and D., I's friend. He had asked him to leave the apartment, with the same cases he had refused.

Then, the defendant, he had two hands on his shoulders.. by shaking his back and forth, which he was able to get rid of, but the same had a pull for his hair, with which D was involved. - Her friend and H. - Her daughter to be taken away from the defendant.

But, according to the indictment, the defendant had then taken a knife from the kitchen with a blade about 20cm, with which he had once hit D.-see I. In the chest and then H.-girl of I. on the belly, and then I had approached., which had struck him three times with a knife, causing him deadly wounds because of the great bloodshed, so the same day he died at the Bad Oynhausen hospital.

With this, the accused is said to have committed criminal work “the assassination” by Article 30, paragraph 1 of the KSAK Criminal Law (official journal number 20/77), which has been in force at the time of the execution of criminal work.

According to the indictment device II, the defendant is accused of being charged by the date, time, and place the same as in the first device of this indictment, deliberately causing body injury to H.G. (I.G., age 14) and D.K. (suffering the deceased) so that while the defendant was fighting the late I.G., damaged D.K. He tried to call the police over the phone.

The defendant, then, is said to have stabbed the 20cm - long kitchen knife to hit the injured D.K. on the right side of the chest, causing cutting wounds, tamgenial drilling, which had caused slight bodily damage, with temporary consequences for the injury.

In addition, the indictment says the defendant had then hit the H. G.- The daughter of the deceased, on the part of the womb, causing cutting wounds on the left side of the abdomin with thin intestine damage, arterital bleeding, apendix damage (result), retroperitoneum, operating intervention, removal of part of the thin intestines and apendix, which have caused serious bodily damage to the life of the injury at the moment of causing.

With this, it is said to have committed criminal work “Plagos of Rend” by Article 38, paragraph 2 of KSAK's Penal Law (United Journal number 20/77), which has been in force at the time of the commission of the criminal work.